Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:2017:2434830.
doi: 10.1155/2017/2434830. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

Risk Assessment for Corneal Ectasia following Photorefractive Keratectomy

Affiliations

Risk Assessment for Corneal Ectasia following Photorefractive Keratectomy

Nir Sorkin et al. J Ophthalmol. 2017.

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the risk factors associated with a series of ectasia cases following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and all published cases.

Methods: In a retrospective study on post-PRK ectasia patients, 9 eyes of 7 patients were included, in addition to 20 eyes of 13 patients from the literature. Risk of post-PRK ectasia was calculated using the ectasia risk score system (ERSS) for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) patients. The percent tissue altered (PTA) was also evaluated.

Results: ERSS scoring of zero for age, RSB, and spherical equivalent was found in 66%, 86%, and 86% of the eyes, respectively. Pachymetry risk score was 2 in 60% of the eyes and 3 or 4 in 16% of the eyes. Topography risk score was 3 in 41% of the eyes and 4 in 21% of the eyes. Cumulative ectasia risk score was ≥4 (high risk) in 77% of the eyes and ≥3 (medium and high risk) in 86% of the eyes. Average PTA was 23.2 ± 7.0%. All eyes but one had a PTA < 40%.

Conclusions: Preoperative corneal topographic abnormalities and thin corneas may be significant risk factors for developing ectasia following PRK. Post-LASIK ectasia risk scoring also has relevance in the risk for developing post-PRK ectasia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The preoperative (a) and post-ectasia (b) topographies of case number 7 in Table 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of the eyes by risk groups (included were eyes from the study cohort and eyes from the literature search): (a) age, (b) residual stromal bed (RSB), (c) pachymetry, (d) spherical equivalent, (e) topography.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of the cumulative ectasia risk scores. Included in the analysis were 22 eyes (from the study cohort and from the literature search) that had available data for all ERSS (ectasia risk score system) parameters.

References

    1. Santhiago M. R., Giacomin N. T., Smadja D., Bechara S. J. Ectasia risk factors in refractive surgery. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2016;10:713–720. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S51313. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miyata K., Takahashi T., Tomidokoro A., Ono K., Oshika T. Iatrogenic keratectasia after phototherapeutic keratectomy. The British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2001;85(2):247–248. England. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parmar D., Claoue C. Keratectasia following excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 2004;82(1):102–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1395-3907.2003.0189b.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim H., Choi J. S., Joo C. K. Corneal ectasia after PRK: clinicopathologic case report. Cornea. 2006;25(7):845–848. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000224634.72309.43. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malecaze F., Coullet J., Calvas P., Fournié P., Arné J. L., Brodaty C. Corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(5):742–746. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.023. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources