Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 1;99(1):9-15.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

Domestic Job Shortage or Job Maldistribution? A Geographic Analysis of the Current Radiation Oncology Job Market

Affiliations

Domestic Job Shortage or Job Maldistribution? A Geographic Analysis of the Current Radiation Oncology Job Market

Mudit Chowdhary et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: To examine whether permanent radiation oncologist (RO) employment opportunities vary based on geography.

Methods and materials: A database of full-time RO jobs was created by use of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Career Center website posts between March 28, 2016, and March 31, 2017. Jobs were first classified by region based on US Census Bureau data. Jobs were further categorized as academic or nonacademic depending on the employer. The prevalence of job openings per 10 million population was calculated to account for regional population differences. The χ2 test was implemented to compare position type across regions. The number and locations of graduating RO during our study period was calculated using National Resident Matching Program data. The χ2 goodness-of-fit test was then used to compare a set of observed proportions of jobs with a corresponding set of hypothesized proportions of jobs based on the proportions of graduates per region.

Results: A total of 211 unique jobs were recorded. The highest and lowest percentages of jobs were seen in the South (31.8%) and Northeast (18.5%), respectively. Of the total jobs, 82 (38.9%) were academic; the South had the highest percentage of overall academic jobs (35.4%), while the West had the lowest (14.6%). Regionally, the Northeast had the highest percentage of academic jobs (56.4%), while the West had the lowest (26.7%). A statistically significant difference was noted between regional academic and nonacademic job availability (P=.021). After we accounted for unit population, the Midwest had the highest number of total jobs per 10 million (9.0) while the South had the lowest (5.9). A significant difference was also observed in the proportion of RO graduates versus actual jobs per region (P=.003), with a surplus of trainees seen in the Northeast.

Conclusions: This study presents a quantitative analysis of the RO job market. We found a disproportionately small number of opportunities compared with graduates trained in the Northeast, as well as a significant regional imbalance of academic versus nonacademic jobs. Long-term monitoring is required to confirm these results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
US map showing locations of all radiation oncologist job opportunities. Highlighted regions indicate US Census region designations: Northeast (blue); Midwest (yellow); South (red); and West (green). Pins indicate job opportunities: academic (white pins) and nonacademic (red pins) positions. (A color version of this figure is available at www.redjournal.org.)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radiation oncologist job opportunities organized by increasing number of jobs by state (A) and increasing number of jobs by state normalized by unit population (B).

Comment in

  • In reply to Royce.
    Chowdhary M, Chhabra AM, Jhaveri J, Sen N, Abrams RA, Patel KR, Marwaha G. Chowdhary M, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Feb 1;100(2):530-531. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.10.011. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018. PMID: 29353663 No abstract available.
  • In Regard to Chowdhary et al.
    Royce TJ. Royce TJ. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Feb 1;100(2):530. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.10.009. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018. PMID: 29353664 No abstract available.

References

    1. Smith BD, Haffty BG, Wilson LD, et al. The future of radiation oncology in the United States from 2010 to 2020: Will supply keep pace with demand? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:5160–5165. - PubMed
    1. National Resident Matching Program. [Accessed February 7, 2017];Data and reports; charting the match. Available at: http://www.nrmp.org/data/
    1. Shah C. Expanding the number of trainees in radiation oncology: Has the pendulum swung too far? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85:1157–1158. - PubMed
    1. Pan HY, Haffty BG, Falit BP, et al. Supply and demand for radiation oncology in the United States: Updated projections for 2015 to 2025. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:493–500. - PubMed
    1. Nabavizadeh N, Burt LM, Mancini BR, et al. Results of the 2013–2015 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology survey of chief residents in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;94:228–234. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources