Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;18(11):e575-e584.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001299.

End-Tidal CO2-Guided Chest Compression Delivery Improves Survival in a Neonatal Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest Model

Affiliations

End-Tidal CO2-Guided Chest Compression Delivery Improves Survival in a Neonatal Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest Model

Justin T Hamrick et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether end-tidal CO2-guided chest compression delivery improves survival over standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation after prolonged asphyxial arrest.

Design: Preclinical randomized controlled study.

Setting: University animal research laboratory.

Subjects: 1-2-week-old swine.

Interventions: After undergoing a 20-minute asphyxial arrest, animals received either standard or end-tidal CO2-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In the standard group, chest compression delivery was optimized by video and verbal feedback to maintain the rate, depth, and release within published guidelines. In the end-tidal CO2-guided group, chest compression rate and depth were adjusted to obtain a maximal end-tidal CO2 level without other feedback. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation included 10 minutes of basic life support followed by advanced life support for 10 minutes or until return of spontaneous circulation.

Measurements and main results: Mean end-tidal CO2 at 10 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 34 ± 8 torr in the end-tidal CO2 group (n = 14) and 19 ± 9 torr in the standard group (n = 14; p = 0.0001). The return of spontaneous circulation rate was 7 of 14 (50%) in the end-tidal CO2 group and 2 of 14 (14%) in the standard group (p = 0.04). The chest compression rate averaged 143 ± 10/min in the end-tidal CO2 group and 102 ± 2/min in the standard group (p < 0.0001). Neither asphyxia-related hypercarbia nor epinephrine administration confounded the use of end-tidal CO2-guided chest compression delivery. The response of the relaxation arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure to the initial epinephrine administration was greater in the end-tidal CO2 group than in the standard group (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). The prevalence of resuscitation-related injuries was similar between groups.

Conclusions: End-tidal CO2-guided chest compression delivery is an effective resuscitation method that improves early survival after prolonged asphyxial arrest in this neonatal piglet model. Optimizing end-tidal CO2 levels during cardiopulmonary resuscitation required that chest compression delivery rate exceed current guidelines. The use of physiologic feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation has the potential to provide optimized and individualized resuscitative efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental timeline indicating events during asphyxia and resuscitation in minutes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
End-tidal CO2 (ETCO2), chest compression rate (CCR), and hemodynamic variables by study group (standard CPR [STD] or ETCO2-guided CPR [ETCO2]). A, ETCO2. B, CCR. C, Relaxation arterial (diastolic blood) pressure (DBP). D, Mean arterial pressure (MAP). E, Central venous pressure (CVP). F, Systemic perfusion pressure (SPP). G, Intracranial pressure (ICP). H, Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Each data point represents the mean value at 30-second intervals. Y-axis values are in mmHg or beats per minute (bpm). X-axis values are in minutes of basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS). X-axis arrows indicate timing of epinephrine administration at 10, 14, and 18 minutes of CPR.
Figure 3
Figure 3
End-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) and hemodynamic variables by survival (STD-SURV = standard group survivors, ETCO2-SURV = ETCO2 group survivors, STD-NON = standard group non-survivors, ETCO2-NON = ETCO2 group non-survivors). A, ETCO2. A1, ETCO2 by study group and survival. B, Relaxation arterial (diastolic blood) pressure (DBP). B1, Relaxation arterial pressure by study group and survival. C, Systemic perfusion pressure (SPP). C1, Systemic perfusion pressure by study group and survival. D, Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). D1, Cerebral perfusion pressure by study group and survival. Each data point represents the mean value at 30-second intervals. Y-axis values are in mmHg. X-axis values are in minutes of basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS). X-axis arrows indicate timing of epinephrine administration at 10, 14, and 18 minutes of CPR.

Comment in

References

    1. Atkins DL, Everson-Stewart S, Sears GK, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children: the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. 2009;119:1484–1491. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg MD, Schexnayder SM, Chameides L, et al. Part 13: pediatric basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122:S862–S875. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al. Pediatric advanced life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e1361–e1399. - PubMed
    1. Girotra S, Spertus JA, Li Y, et al. Survival trends in pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrests: an analysis from Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:42–49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fink EL, Prince DK, Kaltman JR, et al. Unchanged pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and survival rates with regional variation in North America. Resuscitation. 2016;107:121–128. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms