Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 17;17(1):550.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3540-x.

Identification of cancer risk and associated behaviour: implications for social marketing campaigns for cancer prevention

Affiliations

Identification of cancer risk and associated behaviour: implications for social marketing campaigns for cancer prevention

Rebecca Kippen et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Community misconception of what causes cancer is an important consideration when devising communication strategies around cancer prevention, while those initiating social marketing campaigns must decide whether to target the general population or to tailor messages for different audiences. This paper investigates the relationships between demographic characteristics, identification of selected cancer risk factors, and associated protective behaviours, to inform audience segmentation for cancer prevention social marketing.

Methods: Data for this cross-sectional study (n = 3301) are derived from Cancer Council New South Wales' 2013 Cancer Prevention Survey. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship between respondent demographic characteristics and identification of each of seven cancer risk factors; demographic characteristics and practice of the seven 'protective' behaviours associated with the seven cancer risk factors; and identification of cancer risk factors and practising the associated protective behaviours, controlling for demographic characteristics.

Results: More than 90% of respondents across demographic groups identified sun exposure and smoking cigarettes as moderate or large cancer risk factors. Around 80% identified passive smoking as a moderate/large risk factor, and 40-60% identified being overweight or obese, drinking alcohol, not eating enough vegetables and not eating enough fruit. Women and older respondents were more likely to identify most cancer risk factors as moderate/large, and to practise associated protective behaviours. Education was correlated with identification of smoking as a moderate/large cancer risk factor, and with four of the seven protective behaviours. Location (metropolitan/regional) and country of birth (Australia/other) were weak predictors of identification and of protective behaviours. Identification of a cancer risk factor as moderate/large was a significant predictor for five out of seven associated cancer-protective behaviours, controlling for demographic characteristics.

Conclusions: These findings suggest a role for both audience segmentation and whole-of-population approaches in cancer-prevention social marketing campaigns. Targeted campaigns can address beliefs of younger people and men about cancer risk factors. Traditional population campaigns can enhance awareness of being overweight, alcohol consumption, and poor vegetable and fruit intake as cancer risk factors.

Keywords: Cancer; Risk factors; Social marketing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Cancer Council NSW Ethics Committee, and Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (CF14/3853). Participation in the online survey implied consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
How much does spending time outdoors during peak UV times without sun protection contribute to a person’s risk of getting cancer? Responses by respondent demographic characteristics
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
How much does smoking cigarettes contribute to a person’s risk of getting cancer? Responses by respondent demographic characteristics
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
How much does passive smoking contribute to a person’s risk of getting cancer? Responses by respondent demographic characteristics
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
How much does being overweight contribute to a person’s risk of getting cancer? Responses by respondent demographic characteristics
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
How much does drinking alcohol contribute to a person’s risk of getting cancer? Responses by respondent demographic characteristics
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
How much does not eating enough vegetables contribute to a person’s risk of getting cancer? Responses by respondent demographic characteristics
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
How much does not eating enough fruit contribute to a person’s risk of getting cancer? Responses by respondent demographic characteristics
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
How much do each of the following things contribute to a person’s risk of getting cancer? Summary of responses for seven risk factors
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Percentage of respondents with ‘protective’ behaviour, by respondent demographic characteristics: sunsafe
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Percentage of respondents with ‘protective’ behaviour, by respondent demographic characteristics: non-smoker
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Percentage of respondents with ‘protective’ behaviour, by respondent demographic characteristics: avoid passive smoke
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Percentage of respondents with ‘protective’ behaviour, by respondent demographic characteristics: healthy weight
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Percentage of respondents with ‘protective’ behaviour, by respondent demographic characteristics: lower-risk alcohol intake
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Percentage of respondents with ‘protective’ behaviour, by respondent demographic characteristics: five or more vegetable serves daily
Fig. 15
Fig. 15
Percentage of respondents with ‘protective’ behaviour, by respondent demographic characteristics: two or more fruit serves daily
Fig. 16
Fig. 16
Percentage of respondents with ‘protective’ behaviour, by respondent demographic characteristics: summary of seven ‘protective’ behaviours

References

    1. Whiteman DC, Webb PM, Green AC, Neale RE, Fritschi L, Bain CJ, et al. Cancers in Australia in 2010 attributable to modifiable factors: summary and conclusions. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015;39:477–484. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12471. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Danaei G, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD, Murray CJL, Ezzati M, et al. Causes of cancer in the world: comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors. Lancet. 2005;366:1784–1793. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67725-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colditz GA, Wolin KY, Gehlert S. Applying what we know to accelerate cancer prevention. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:1–9. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003218. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prevent Cancer Foundation: Preventable cancers. http://preventcancer.org/prevention/preventable-cancers/#sthash.kxK5IcoG... (n.d.). Accessed 18 Oct 2016.
    1. Willcox SJ, Stewart BW, Sitas F. What factors do cancer patients believe contribute to the development of their cancer? Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22:1503–1511. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9824-6. - DOI - PubMed