Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):1518-1527.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.01470217. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

A Scoping Review for Strategies to Increase Living Kidney Donation

Affiliations

A Scoping Review for Strategies to Increase Living Kidney Donation

Lianne Barnieh et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: The literature on strategies to increase the number of potential living kidney donors is extensive and has yet to be characterized. Scoping reviews are a novel methodology for systematically assessing a wide breadth of a given body of literature and may be done before conducting a more targeted systematic review.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We performed a scoping review and summarized the evidence for existing strategies to increase living kidney donation.

Results: Our review identified seven studies that tested interventions using rigorous methods (i.e., randomized, controlled trials) and outcome measures, all of which focused on using education targeted at potential recipients to increase living donation. Of these, two studies that targeted the potential recipients' close social network reported statistically significant results. Other interventions were identified, but their effect was assessed through quasiexperimental or observational study designs.

Conclusions: We identified an important gap in the literature for evidence-based strategies to increase living kidney donation. From the limited data available, strategies directed at potential recipients and their social networks are the most promising. These results can inform transplant programs that are considering strategies to increase living kidney donation and highlight the need for conduct of high-quality study to increase living donation.

Keywords: Living Donors; Nephrectomy; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Social Support; Tissue and Organ Harvesting; end stage kidney disease; kidney; kidney donation; kidney transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow of studies.

Comment in

References

    1. Meguid El Nahas A, Bello AK: Chronic kidney disease: The global challenge. Lancet 365: 331–340, 2005 - PubMed
    1. Atkins RC: The epidemiology of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl 94: S14–S18, 2005 - PubMed
    1. Perico N, Remuzzi G: Chronic kidney disease: A research and public health priority. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27[Suppl 3]: iii19–iii26, 2012 - PubMed
    1. Port FK, Wolfe RA, Mauger EA, Berling DP, Jiang K: Comparison of survival probabilities for dialysis patients vs cadaveric renal transplant recipients. JAMA 270: 1339–1343, 1993 - PubMed
    1. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa LY, Held PJ, Port FK: Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 341: 1725–1730, 1999 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms