Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Oct:379:205-15.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016248.

Differences in synaptic efficacy at neuromuscular junctions in frog twitch muscles

Differences in synaptic efficacy at neuromuscular junctions in frog twitch muscles

L R Banner et al. J Physiol. 1986 Oct.

Abstract

A comparison was made of neuromuscular junctions in cutaneous pectoris and cutaneous dorsi muscles of Rana pipiens in order to study mechanisms controlling synaptic efficacy. Other than a small difference in junctional size, the two muscles were structurally and functionally very similar. Despite these similarities, cutaneous pectoris junctions had substantially higher synaptic safety margins. With intracellular recording, it was apparent that the difference in safety margin was due to a large difference in transmitter release. In low-Ca2+ solutions, levels of evoked and spontaneous release were 4 times higher in the cutaneous pectoris. When corrected for differences in nerve terminal size at identified junctions, there remained a 3-fold difference in evoked release and a 6-fold difference in spontaneous release per unit terminal length. Differences in normal Ringer solution were 1.8- and 2.5-fold for evoked and spontaneous release, respectively. There was no simple relationship between synaptic efficacy and the total amount of nerve terminal supported by each motoneurone in different frog muscles. We concluded that there can be large differences in synaptic efficacy without correlated structural differences visible with the light microscope.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Physiol. 1971 Mar;213(3):545-56 - PubMed
    1. J Neurocytol. 1976 Dec;5(6):691-718 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1979 May 17;279(5710):254-6 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1980 Feb;299:621-38 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Neurol. 1980 Oct 15;193(4):1035-45 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources