Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2017 Nov;66(11):1886-1899.
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314109. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS)

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS)

Sabina Beg et al. Gut. 2017 Nov.

Erratum in

Abstract

This document represents the first position statement produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, setting out the minimum expected standards in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The need for this statement has arisen from the recognition that while technical competence can be rapidly acquired, in practice the performance of a high-quality examination is variable, with an unacceptably high rate of failure to diagnose cancer at endoscopy. The importance of detecting early neoplasia has taken on greater significance in this era of minimally invasive, organ-preserving endoscopic therapy. In this position statement we describe 38 recommendations to improve diagnostic endoscopy quality. Our goal is to emphasise practices that encourage mucosal inspection and lesion recognition, with the aim of optimising the early diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal disease and improving patient outcomes.

Keywords: OGD; early upper gastro-intestinal cancer; key performance indicators; quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the statement development process. OGD, oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy; PICO, Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A schematic demonstrating the recommended stations for photo-documentation during a diagnostic oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy. (Reproduced with permision from Thieme [43]).

Comment in

References

    1. Barrison I, Bramble M, Wilkinson M. Provision of endoscopy related services in district general hospitals: British Society of Gastroenterology. Endoscopy Committee 2001.
    1. England PH. National Cancer intelligence Network be clear on Cancer: oesophago-gastric cancer awareness regional pilot campaign: Interim evaluation report, 2015.
    1. Joint advisory group on GI endoscopy http://www.thejag.org.uk.
    1. Chadwick G, Groene O, Hoare J, et al. . A population-based, retrospective, cohort study of esophageal cancer missed at endoscopy. Endoscopy 2014;46:553–60. 10.1055/s-0034-1365646 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Veitch AM, Uedo N, Yao K, et al. . Optimizing early upper gastrointestinal cancer detection at endoscopy. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;12:660–7. 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.128 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms