Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS)
- PMID: 28821598
- PMCID: PMC5739858
- DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314109
Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS)
Erratum in
-
Correction: Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS).Gut. 2017 Dec;66(12):2188. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314109corr1. Gut. 2017. PMID: 29127273 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
This document represents the first position statement produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, setting out the minimum expected standards in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The need for this statement has arisen from the recognition that while technical competence can be rapidly acquired, in practice the performance of a high-quality examination is variable, with an unacceptably high rate of failure to diagnose cancer at endoscopy. The importance of detecting early neoplasia has taken on greater significance in this era of minimally invasive, organ-preserving endoscopic therapy. In this position statement we describe 38 recommendations to improve diagnostic endoscopy quality. Our goal is to emphasise practices that encourage mucosal inspection and lesion recognition, with the aim of optimising the early diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal disease and improving patient outcomes.
Keywords: OGD; early upper gastro-intestinal cancer; key performance indicators; quality.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Comment in
-
Quality standards and performance measures: steps to high quality diagnostic endoscopy.Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan 28;3:7. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2018.01.04. eCollection 2018. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 29441372 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Editorial on quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS).Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb 28;3:13. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2018.01.05. eCollection 2018. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 29552664 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Barrison I, Bramble M, Wilkinson M. Provision of endoscopy related services in district general hospitals: British Society of Gastroenterology. Endoscopy Committee 2001.
-
- England PH. National Cancer intelligence Network be clear on Cancer: oesophago-gastric cancer awareness regional pilot campaign: Interim evaluation report, 2015.
-
- Joint advisory group on GI endoscopy http://www.thejag.org.uk.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous