Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 18;7(1):8745.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08592-9.

Effect of the land area elevation on the collective choice in ants

Affiliations

Effect of the land area elevation on the collective choice in ants

Olivier Bles et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Collective decisions regarding food source exploitation in social insects are influenced by a range of parameters, from source quality to individual preference and social information sharing. Those regarding the elevation of the physical trail towards a food source have been neglected. In this work, we investigated the effect of ascending and descending paths from the nest to a food source on collective choice in two ant species Lasius niger and Myrmica rubra. Our hypothesis that returning loaded with food from the high source is more energy efficient was validated by choice experiments: when the sources are simultaneously introduced the high food source is preferentially exploited by both species. The flexibility of colony response was then tested by introducing the preferred source (high) incidentally, after recruitment towards the down food source began. Despite the well-known lack of flexibility of L. niger, both species showed the ability to reallocate their foraging workforce towards the highest food source. The collective choice and the flexibility are based on the difference between the u-turn rates when foragers are facing the ascending or descending branch. We discuss these results in terms of species-specifics characteristics and ecological context.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative number of foragers at the two food sources for 2 h in each condition. Mean and standard deviation; numbers above bars = number of replicates. DD = Down-Down, control condition, two descending paths to food sources. HH = High-High, control condition, two ascending paths to food sources. HD = High-Down, experimental condition, left path ascending to food source and right path descending to food source. DH = Down-High, experimental condition, left path descending to food source and right path ascending to food source. D → H = Down → High, experimental condition, only down food source available at the end of left path during the first 20 min of experiment before incidentally introduction of the high food source at the end of the right branch.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Strength of choice towards a food source. Percentage of experiments against percentage of total foragers present at the high food source for each experimental condition and species. For the D → H condition, as in Table 1, we separated the results into two phases, before and after the introduction of the second food source.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Discovery of and time spent at food sources. Mean and standard deviation; numbers above bars = N.
Figure 4
Figure 4
HD experimental setup. The nest (1) and its unique entry (2) facing the first branch of 15 cm leading to the T-maze with ascending and descending branches (HD setup shown). A syrup feeder (1 M sucrose) was placed on a platform at the end of either the ascending or descending branch of the maze. The number of ants was counted at each food source, and U-turns were measured at point (2) of the ascending branch and (4) for the descending one.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pasteels, J. M., Deneubourg, J.-L. & Goss, S. Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies (I): trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources. In From individual to collective behavior in social insects, 177–196 (Birkhauser, 1987).
    1. Camazine S, Sneyd J, Jenkins MJ, Murray JD. A Mathematical Model of Self-organized Pattern Formation on the Combs of Honeybee Colonies. J. Theo. Biol. 1990;147:553–571. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80264-4. - DOI
    1. Seeley TD, Camazine S, Sneyd J. Collective decision-making in honey bees: How colonies choose among nectar sources. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1991;28:277–290. doi: 10.1007/BF00175101. - DOI
    1. Seeley, T. D. The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies (Harvard University Press, 1995).
    1. Beckers R, Deneubourg J-L, Goss S. Modulation of trail laying in the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source. J. Insect Behav. 1993;6:751–759. doi: 10.1007/BF01201674. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources