Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Jan;53(1):37-51.
doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1375-5. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

Modifiable factors and esophageal cancer: a systematic review of published meta-analyses

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Modifiable factors and esophageal cancer: a systematic review of published meta-analyses

Clara Castro et al. J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

There are marked differences in the etiology of the major histological types of esophageal cancer (EC)-squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) and adenocarcinomas (EAC). This study aimed to summarize the current scientific knowledge on modifiable risk factors for EC, by histological type, through a systematic review of meta-analyses referenced in PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge. We identified 100 meta-analyses on risk factors for ESCC (n = 54), EAC (n = 43), or EC (n = 51). ESCC risk significantly increased with alcohol and maté drinking, smoking, red and processed meat consumption and human papillomavirus infection, while it was negatively associated with body mass index and consumption of fruit, vegetables, white meat, folate, and some carotenoids. Cessation of drinking and smoking significantly reduced ESCC risk. For EAC, an increased risk was reported for smoking, body mass index, and red and processed meat consumption, while risk decreased with Helicobacter pylori infection, low/moderate alcohol drinking, physical activity, and consumption of fruit, vegetables, folate, fiber, beta-carotene, and vitamin C. Differences in results between meta-analyses and mechanisms underlying some of the associations found are discussed. This work reinforces the importance of a separate assessment of EC subtypes to allow for a proper evaluation of incidence trends and planning of prevention/control interventions.

Keywords: Adenocarcinoma; Carcinoma; Esophageal neoplasms; Review; Risk factors; Squamous cell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gut. 2011 Aug;60(8):1029-37 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Feb;89(2):568-76 - PubMed
    1. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Nov-Dec;26(8):807-16 - PubMed
    1. BMC Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;11:96 - PubMed
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;109(6):822-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources