Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;217(4):418.e1-418.e6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.020. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

The environmental injustice of beauty: framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern

Affiliations

The environmental injustice of beauty: framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern

Ami R Zota et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

The obstetrics-gynecology community has issued a call to action to prevent toxic environmental chemical exposures and their threats to healthy human reproduction. Recent committee opinions recognize that vulnerable and underserved women may be impacted disproportionately by environmental chemical exposures and recommend that reproductive health professionals champion policies that secure environmental justice. Beauty product use is an understudied source of environmental chemical exposures. Beauty products can include reproductive and developmental toxicants such as phthalates and heavy metals; however, disclosure requirements are limited and inconsistent. Compared with white women, women of color have higher levels of beauty product-related environmental chemicals in their bodies, independent of socioeconomic status. Even small exposures to toxic chemicals during critical periods of development (such as pregnancy) can trigger adverse health consequences (such as impacts on fertility and pregnancy, neurodevelopment, and cancer). In this commentary, we seek to highlight the connections between environmental justice and beauty product-related chemical exposures. We describe racial/ethnic differences in beauty product use (such as skin lighteners, hair straighteners, and feminine hygiene products) and the potential chemical exposures and health risks that are associated with these products. We also discuss how targeted advertising can take advantage of mainstream beauty norms to influence the use of these products. Reproductive health professionals can use this information to advance environmental justice by being prepared to counsel patients who have questions about toxic environmental exposures from beauty care products and other sources. Researchers and healthcare providers can also promote health-protective policies such as improved ingredient testing and disclosure for the beauty product industry. Future clinical and public health research should consider beauty product use as a factor that may shape health inequities in women's reproductive health across the life course.

Keywords: cosmetics; endocrine-disrupting chemicals; environmental justice; health disparity; toxic environmental chemicals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Comment in

  • Better Reporting Needed for Cosmetics and Women's Health.
    Walter JR, Jacob SL, Xu S. Walter JR, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):265-266. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.558. Epub 2017 Nov 11. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29138032 No abstract available.
  • Understanding cosmetic product regulation could help reduce disparities.
    Berger M. Berger M. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):264-265. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.557. Epub 2017 Nov 11. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29138034 No abstract available.
  • Reply.
    Zota AR, Shamasunder B. Zota AR, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):266. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.573. Epub 2017 Nov 16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29155141 No abstract available.

References

    1. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee. Committee opinion no 575: Exposure to toxic environmental agents. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:931–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Di Renzo GC, Conry JA, Blake J, et al. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics opinion on reproductive health impacts of exposure to toxic environmental chemicals. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131:219–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chavis BJ, Lee C. Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites. New York, NY: United Church of Christ Commission on Racial Justice; 1987.
    1. Brulle RJ, Pellow DN. Environmental justice: human health and environmental inequalities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:103–24. - PubMed
    1. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Enviromental Justice. http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/. Accessed June 21, 2017.

Publication types