The environmental injustice of beauty: framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern
- PMID: 28822238
- PMCID: PMC5614862
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.020
The environmental injustice of beauty: framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern
Abstract
The obstetrics-gynecology community has issued a call to action to prevent toxic environmental chemical exposures and their threats to healthy human reproduction. Recent committee opinions recognize that vulnerable and underserved women may be impacted disproportionately by environmental chemical exposures and recommend that reproductive health professionals champion policies that secure environmental justice. Beauty product use is an understudied source of environmental chemical exposures. Beauty products can include reproductive and developmental toxicants such as phthalates and heavy metals; however, disclosure requirements are limited and inconsistent. Compared with white women, women of color have higher levels of beauty product-related environmental chemicals in their bodies, independent of socioeconomic status. Even small exposures to toxic chemicals during critical periods of development (such as pregnancy) can trigger adverse health consequences (such as impacts on fertility and pregnancy, neurodevelopment, and cancer). In this commentary, we seek to highlight the connections between environmental justice and beauty product-related chemical exposures. We describe racial/ethnic differences in beauty product use (such as skin lighteners, hair straighteners, and feminine hygiene products) and the potential chemical exposures and health risks that are associated with these products. We also discuss how targeted advertising can take advantage of mainstream beauty norms to influence the use of these products. Reproductive health professionals can use this information to advance environmental justice by being prepared to counsel patients who have questions about toxic environmental exposures from beauty care products and other sources. Researchers and healthcare providers can also promote health-protective policies such as improved ingredient testing and disclosure for the beauty product industry. Future clinical and public health research should consider beauty product use as a factor that may shape health inequities in women's reproductive health across the life course.
Keywords: cosmetics; endocrine-disrupting chemicals; environmental justice; health disparity; toxic environmental chemicals.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Better Reporting Needed for Cosmetics and Women's Health.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):265-266. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.558. Epub 2017 Nov 11. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29138032 No abstract available.
-
Understanding cosmetic product regulation could help reduce disparities.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):264-265. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.557. Epub 2017 Nov 11. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29138034 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):266. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.573. Epub 2017 Nov 16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29155141 No abstract available.
References
-
- Chavis BJ, Lee C. Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites. New York, NY: United Church of Christ Commission on Racial Justice; 1987.
-
- Brulle RJ, Pellow DN. Environmental justice: human health and environmental inequalities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:103–24. - PubMed
-
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Enviromental Justice. http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/. Accessed June 21, 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
