Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;12(3):141-150.
doi: 10.1007/s11751-017-0293-7. Epub 2017 Aug 20.

Midshaft clavicle fractures treatment: threaded Kirschner wire versus conservative approach

Affiliations

Midshaft clavicle fractures treatment: threaded Kirschner wire versus conservative approach

Valentino Coppa et al. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Clavicle fractures are common, accounting for 2.6 to 10% of all fractures. Treatment of these fractures is usually non-surgical. Recent evidence, however, reveals that the final result of non-surgically midshaft clavicular fractures, particularly those with quite large displacements or shortening, is not like that which was previously thought. This study evaluated retrospectively all patients presented with a clavicle fracture at Emergency Department of our Institution, between January 2006 and December 2011. Fractures were classified according to Allman's radiographic classification system, modified by Nordqvist and Petersson. Patients were distinguished into two groups: one that underwent conservative treatment with a "figure-of-8" orthosis and one that underwent surgery with reduction in fracture and fixation with intramedullary threaded Kirschner wire. Pin removal was performed after 4 weeks of rest in Gilchrist bandage, after clinical and radiographic evaluation demonstrating the bone healing. The QuickDASH score and the Constant Murley Shoulder Score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. The radiographic outcome was evaluated at 1 and 6 months of follow-up. Database review provided a final cohort of 58 patients, with similar demographic features. There was no significant difference in qDASH and CS between the two groups. The results of qDASH and CS evaluated in function of the radiographic outcome show a statistically significant correlation between the worst qDASH and CS results and the grade of malunion in both groups. In particular, we have found unsatisfactory results when final shortening of the clavicle was 20 mm or more. On radiographic evaluation, surgical treatment demonstrated a greater efficacy in reducing initial shortening of the fractured bone; this is in opposition to conservative treatment that results very often in malunion, shortening, anatomic alterations and loss of functionality. The use of intramedullary threaded Kirschner wire for fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures is a safe procedure and is recommended in case of shortening greater than 2 cm in high-function-demand patients.

Keywords: Clavicle fracture; Clavicle pinning; Conservative treatment; Midshaft; Mini invasive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Algorithm used to determine the study cohort
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Figure shows the essential surgical instruments and the main steps of our technique
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Figure shows the radiography of midshaft clavicle fracture a before and b after the surgical treatment
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Box plot with outcomes of a constant score (best score = 0), b qDASH score (best score = 0) compared by the type of treatment
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Box plot of DASH (I, II) score and constant score divided (III, IV) by treatment (I, III surgical treatment; II, IV conservative treatment and radiograph shortening

References

    1. O’Neill BJ, Hirpara KM, O’Briain D, McGarr C, Kaar TK. Clavicle fractures: a comparison of five classification systems and their relationship to treatment outcomes. Int Orthop. 2011;35:909–914. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1151-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanley D, Trowbridge EA, Norris SH. The mechanism of clavicular fracture. A clinical and biomechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:461–464. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198870030-00024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xu JJ, Xu L, Xu W, Gu Y, Xu JJ. Operative versus nonoperative treatment in the management of midshaft clavicular fractures: ameta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23:173–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.06.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hübner EJ, Hausschild O, Südkamp NP, Strohm PC. Clavicle fractures—is there a standard treatment? Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011;78:288–296. - PubMed
    1. Neer CS. Nonunion of the clavicle. J Am Med Assoc. 1960;172:1006–1011. doi: 10.1001/jama.1960.03020100014003. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources