Patient and system factors of time to surgery after hip fracture: a scoping review
- PMID: 28827264
- PMCID: PMC5724192
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016939
Patient and system factors of time to surgery after hip fracture: a scoping review
Abstract
Objectives: It is disputed whether the time a patient waits for surgery after hip fracture increases the risk of in-hospital death. This uncertainty matters as access to surgery following hip fracture may be underprioritised due to a lack of definitive evidence. Uncertainty in the available evidence may be due to differences in characteristics of patients, their injury and their care. We summarised the literature on patients and system factors associated with time to surgery, and collated proposed mechanisms for the associations.
Methods: We used the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al for synthesis of factors and mechanisms of time to surgery after hip fracture in adults aged >50 years, published in English, between 1 January 2000 and 28 February 2017, and indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL or Ageline. Proposed mechanisms for reported associations were extracted from discussion sections.
Results: We summarised evidence from 26 articles that reported on 24 patient and system factors of time to surgery post hip fracture. In total, 16 factors were reported by only one article. For 16 factors we found proposed mechanisms for their association with time to surgery which included surgical readiness, available resources, prioritisation and out-of-hours admission.
Conclusions: We identified patient and system factors associated with time to surgery after hip fracture. This new knowledge will inform evaluation of the putative timing-death association. Future interventions should be designed to influence factors with modifiable mechanisms for delay.
Keywords: Scoping review; hip fracture; patient factors; system factors; time to surgery.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: PG has received grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation and the British Columbia Specialists Services Committee for work around hip fracture care not related to this manuscript. He has also received fees from the BC Specialists Services Committee (for a provincial quality improvement project on redesign of hip fracture care) and from Stryker Orthopedics (as a product development consultant). He is a board member and shareholder of Traumis Surgical Systems Inc. and a board member of the Canadian Orthopedic Foundation. He also serves on the speakers’ bureaus of AO Trauma North America and Stryker Canada. KJS, BS and YFVV declare they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health Indicators. Ottawa, ON: CIHI, 2007. 2007.
-
- National Office of Clinical Audit. Irish Hip Fracture Database National Report. 2013. https://www.noca.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/IHFD-National-Report-2014... (accessed 29 Sep 2016).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical