Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;175(2):970-981.
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00173. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

Phospholipase C2 Affects MAMP-Triggered Immunity by Modulating ROS Production

Affiliations

Phospholipase C2 Affects MAMP-Triggered Immunity by Modulating ROS Production

Juan Martín D'Ambrosio et al. Plant Physiol. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

The activation of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) is one of the earliest responses triggered by the recognition of several microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) in plants. The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) PI-PLC gene family is composed of nine members. Previous studies suggested a role for PLC2 in MAMP-triggered immunity, as it is rapidly phosphorylated in vivo upon treatment with the bacterial MAMP flg22. Here, we analyzed the role of PLC2 in plant immunity using an artificial microRNA to silence PLC2 expression in Arabidopsis. We found that PLC2-silenced plants are more susceptible to the type III secretion system-deficient bacterial strain Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst) DC3000 hrcC- and to the nonadapted pea (Pisum sativum) powdery mildew Erysiphe pisi However, PLC2-silenced plants display normal susceptibility to virulent (Pst DC3000) and avirulent (Pst DC3000 AvrRPM1) P. syringae strains, conserving typical hypersensitive response features. In response to flg22, PLC2-silenced plants maintain wild-type mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and PHI1, WRKY33, and FRK1 immune marker gene expression but have reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent responses such as callose deposition and stomatal closure. Accordingly, the generation of ROS upon flg22 treatment is compromised in the PLC2-defficient plants, suggesting an effect of PLC2 in a branch of MAMP-triggered immunity and nonhost resistance that involves early ROS-regulated processes. Consistently, PLC2 associates with the NADPH oxidase RBOHD, suggesting its potential regulation by PLC2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PLC2 silencing by artificial microRNAs in Arabidopsis. A, Total RNA was isolated from leaves of 4- to 5-week-old Columbia-0 (Col-0) or PLC2-silenced plants (T4 homozygous lines amiR-PLC2-4, amiR-PLC2-7, and amiR-PLC2-11). Relative transcript levels of PLC2 were determined by RT-qPCR. Transcript levels were normalized to ACT2. Error bars represent sd of three to nine individual plants. Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA for unbalanced samples, posthoc Tukey-Kramer test at P < 0.001). B, PLC2 protein levels were analyzed by western blot using anti-AtPLC2 antibody in leaves of 4- to 5-week-old Col-0, empty vector (EV), and amiR-PLC2-11 and amiR-PLC2-4 independent silenced lines. Ponceau S staining of Rubisco subunit L was included as a loading control.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Growth of P. syringae and E. pisi in Arabidopsis PLC2-silenced plants. Wild-type (Col-0), empty vector (EV), and PLC2-silenced lines (amiR-PLC2-11 and amiR-PLC2-4) were used. A, PLC2-silenced plants are more susceptible to the Pst DC3000 hrcC mutant. Bacteria were inoculated by spray at OD600 = 0.1, and the number of colony-forming units (CFU) per cm2 of leaf extracts was determined. Data from three biological replicates each with three technical replicates were averaged (n = 9), and ANOVA was performed considering each replicate as a factor. Error bars represents se. Different letters indicate significant differences between genotypes (ANOVA, P < 0.001, posthoc Tukey’s test). dpi, Days postinoculation. B, PLC2-silenced plants do not show increased susceptibility to the Pst DC3000 hrcC mutant when the bacteria are syringe inoculated into the leaf apoplast. Bacterial suspension was inoculated at OD600 = 0.0001, and the number of CFU per cm2 of leaf extracts was determined. Data from three biological replicates each with three technical replicates were averaged (n = 9), and ANOVA was performed considering each replicate as a factor. No significant differences were observed between genotypes. Error bars represent se. C and D, PLC2-silenced lines showed no differences in susceptibility to virulent (C) and avirulent (D) Pst DC3000 infections. Pst DC3000 (virulent) and Pst DC3000:AvrRpm1 (avirulent) were inoculated by infiltration at OD600 = 0.0002, and CFU per cm2 of leaf was calculated. A representative experiment of four biological replicates is depicted. No significant differences were observed regarding the EV control according to Student’s t test (P < 0.05). E, PLC2-silenced plants are more susceptible to the nonadapted pea powdery mildew E. pisi. The penetration rate at 3 d after inoculation was calculated as the percentage of successful penetration of at least 50 germinated spores on three independent leaves. Error bars represent se. Different letters indicate significant differences (multiple comparison using one-way ANOVA, posthoc Tukey’s test at P < 0.05). One representative experiment of four biologically independent replicates is depicted.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
PLC2-silenced plants exhibit impaired flg22-induced callose deposition. Leaves from 4- to 5-week-old Col-0 or amiR-PLC2 plants were infiltrated with 1 µm flg22 or water as a control and incubated for 18 h, and callose deposition was measured as dots per area. Six different microscopic areas (1 mm2) were taken per leaf. Two different leaves per individual were analyzed. Three independent plants were analyzed per line per experiment. Three independent experiments were performed. Error bars represent se. Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA for unbalanced samples, posthoc Tukey-Kramer test at P < 0.001). EV, Empty vector.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
PLC2-silenced plants exhibit impaired flg22-induced stomatal closure. Epidermal peels from Col-0 and PLC2-silenced plants were incubated in opening buffer under light for 3 h. The peels were treated with water, 1 µm flg22, 50 µm ABA, or 50 µm ABA + 1 µm flg22 for 1 h. The results show means of 90 to 120 stomata measured from three independent experiments. Error bars represent se. Different letters denote statistical differences (ANOVA for unbalanced samples, posthoc Tukey-Kramer test at P < 0.05). EV, Empty vector.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
PLC2-silenced plants exhibit impaired flg22-induced oxidative burst. The production of ROS was measured with a luminol-based assay in Col-0 or amiR-PLC2 plants. A, Leaf discs from 4- to 5-week-old plants were incubated with 100 nm flg22, and the luminescence was measured every 1 min for 30 min and expressed as relative light units (RLU). A representative experiment is shown using wild-type (Col-0) and a PLC2-silenced line (amiR-PLC2-11) plants. B, Total ROS production was calculated integrating the areas under the curves and referring to the Col-0 wild type treated with flg22 as 100%. Averages of four independent experiments are shown. Error bars represent se. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with the flg22-treated Col-0 plant (ANOVA for unbalanced samples, multiple comparisons versus control group posthoc Dunnett’s method at P < 0.05). EV, Empty vector.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
PLC2 associates with RBOHD. Coimmunoprecipitation of PLC2 and ROBHD was performed in stable transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings (T3) expressing FLAG-RBOHD (pRBOHD:FLAG-RBOHD) treated (+) or not (−) with 1 µm flg22 for 15 min. Total protein extracts (Input) were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-FLAG beads followed by immunoblot analysis with anti-PLC2 (α-PLC2) and anti-FLAG (α-FLAG) antibodies as indicated. Protein extracts of Col-0 plants were used as negative controls. Anit-BRI1 (α-BRI1) antibodies were used as plasma membrane protein not associated with RBOHD. CBB, Coomassie Brilliant Blue. These experiments were performed three times with similar results.

References

    1. Abd-El-Haliem AM, Vossen JH, van Zeijl A, Dezhsetan S, Testerink C, Seidl MF, Beck M, Strutt J, Robatzek S, Joosten MH (2016) Biochemical characterization of the tomato phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) family and its role in plant immunity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1861: 1365–1378 - PubMed
    1. Albrecht C, Russinova E, Hecht V, Baaijens E, de Vries S (2005) The Arabidopsis thaliana SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASES1 and 2 control male sporogenesis. Plant Cell 17: 3337–3349 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersson MX, Kourtchenko O, Dangl JL, Mackey D, Ellerström M (2006) Phospholipase-dependent signalling during the AvrRpm1- and AvrRpt2-induced disease resistance responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 47: 947–959 - PubMed
    1. Anthony RG, Khan S, Costa J, Pais MS, Bögre L (2006) The Arabidopsis protein kinase PTI1-2 is activated by convergent phosphatidic acid and oxidative stress signaling pathways downstream of PDK1 and OXI1. J Biol Chem 281: 37536–37546 - PubMed
    1. Antolín-Llovera M, Petutsching EK, Ried MK, Lipka V, Nürnberger T, Robatzek S, Parniske M (2014) Knowing your friends and foes: plant receptor-like kinases as initiators of symbiosis or defence. New Phytol 204: 791–802 - PubMed

MeSH terms