Bladder Reconstruction Rates Differ among Centers Participating in National Spina Bifida Patient Registry
- PMID: 28830753
- PMCID: PMC5760329
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.084
Bladder Reconstruction Rates Differ among Centers Participating in National Spina Bifida Patient Registry
Abstract
Purpose: We performed an exploratory analysis of data from the NSBPR (National Spina Bifida Patient Registry) to assess variation in the frequency of bladder reconstruction surgeries among NSBPR centers.
Materials and methods: We queried the 2009-2014 NSBPR to identify patients who had ever undergone bladder reconstruction surgeries. We evaluated demographic characteristics, spina bifida type, functional level, mobility and NSBPR center to determine whether any of these factors were associated with reconstructive surgery rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to simultaneously adjust for the impact of these factors.
Results: We identified 5,528 patients with spina bifida enrolled in the NSBPR. Of these patients 1,129 (20.4%) underwent bladder reconstruction (703 augmentation, 382 continent catheterizable channel, 189 bladder outlet procedure). Surgical patients were more likely older, female, nonHispanic white, with a higher lesion level, myelomeningocele diagnosis, nonambulators (all p <0.001) and nonprivately insured (p=0.018). Bladder reconstruction surgery rates varied among NSBPR centers (range 12.1% to 37.9%, p <0.001). After correcting for known confounders NSBPR center, spina bifida type, mobility, gender and age (all p <0.001) were significant predictors of surgical intervention. Race (p=0.19) and insurance status (p=0.11) were not associated with surgical intervention.
Conclusions: There is significant variation in rates of bladder reconstruction surgery among NSBPR centers. In addition to clinical factors such as mobility status, lesion type and lesion level, nonclinical factors such as patient age, gender and treating center are also associated with the likelihood of an individual undergoing bladder reconstruction.
Keywords: clinical decision-making; neurogenic; pediatrics; spinal dysraphism; urinary bladder; urology.
Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2018 Jan;199(1):273. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.116. Epub 2017 Sep 21. J Urol. 2018. PMID: 28941381 No abstract available.
-
Variability in Care-What Would Business People Think?J Urol. 2018 Jan;199(1):40-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 16. J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29049895 No abstract available.
References
-
- Lloyd JC, Wiener JS, Gargollo PC, et al. Contemporary epidemiological trends in complex congenital genitourinary anomalies. J Urol. 2013;190:1590. - PubMed
-
- Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, et al. Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88:1008. - PubMed
-
- Snow-Lisy DC, Yerkes EB, Cheng EY. Update on Urological Management of Spina Bifida from Prenatal Diagnosis to Adulthood. J Urol. 2015 - PubMed
-
- Scales CD, Jr, Wiener JS. Evaluating outcomes of enterocystoplasty in patients with spina bifida: a review of the literature. J Urol. 2008;180:2323. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical