Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May 20;3(3):176-179.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.04.002. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Teledermatology: An updated overview of clinical applications and reimbursement policies

M Campagna  1 , F Naka  2 , J Lu  3
Affiliations
Review

Teledermatology: An updated overview of clinical applications and reimbursement policies

M Campagna et al. Int J Womens Dermatol. .

Abstract

Telemedicine is an emerging field in healthcare that provides services from different medical specialties to patients all around the world. One of the specialties in telemedicine, teledermatology, has grown exponentially as a cost-effective way to implement dermatological healthcare to underserved areas and populations. This article reviews the literature that pertains to the cost-effectiveness, reliability, public access, patient satisfaction, and reimbursement policies of teledermatology. Teledermatology was found to be cost-effective and reliable in reducing in-person visits and time away from work, and allows for the faster delivery of care. However, reimbursement policies for teledermatology services are rather new and vary significantly from state to state. As public interest in and access to teledermatology continue to grow, the future of teledermatology depends on the development of new technology as well as quality improvement strategies and the evolution of sustainable reimbursement policies.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; real-time teledermatology; reimbursement policy; store and forward teledermatology; teledermatology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Armstrong A.W., Dorer D.J., Lugn N.E., Kvedar J.C. Economic evaluation of interactive teledermatology compared with conventional care. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13(2):91–99. - PubMed
    1. Armstrong A.W., Kwong M.W., Ledo L., Nesbitt T.S., Shewry S.L. Practice models and challenges in teledermatology: A study of collective experiences from teledermatologists. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong A.W., Wu J., Kovarik C.L. State of teledermatology program in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:939–944. - PubMed
    1. Center for Connected Health Policy National telehealth policy resource center [Internet] 2016. http://www.cchpca.org/national-telehealth-policy-resource-center [cited 2016 November]. Available from:
    1. Coates S.J., Kvedar J., Granstein R.D. Teledermatology: From historical perspective to emerging techniques of the modern era: Part I: History, rationale, and current practice. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(4):563–574. - PubMed