Are CD68 and Factor VIII-RA Expression Different in Central and Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma of Jaw: An Immunohistochemical Comparative Study
- PMID: 28832079
- DOI: 10.5146/tjpath.2017.01401
Are CD68 and Factor VIII-RA Expression Different in Central and Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma of Jaw: An Immunohistochemical Comparative Study
Abstract
Objective: Central giant cell granuloma and peripheral giant cell granuloma of the jaw and oral cavity are identical in histopathologic features, although they are different in pathogenesis and clinical behavior. The aim of present study was to compare CD 68 and factor VIII related antigen (VIII-RA ) immunoreactivity in central giant cell granuloma and peripheral giant cell granuloma to determine the biologic nature and clinical behavior of these lesions which may lead to a better or new treatment modality.
Material and method: CD68 and factor VIII-RA expression were examined immunohistochemically in 22 cases of central giant cell granuloma (10 aggressive and 12 non- aggressive ) and 19 cases of peripheral giant cell granuloma. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn test was used for data analysis.
Results: CD68 expression was observed in approximately 100% of multinucleated giant cells and 50% of mononuclear cells. Overexpression of factor VIII-RA in the endothelial cells of capillary like vessels in the periphery of the lesions was prominent. A statistical significant difference for CD68 intensity score in mononuclear cells among three groups (P=0.016) was observed. Indeed, factor VIII-RA intensity score in the endothelial cells of central giant cell granuloma and peripheral giant cell granuloma showed significant difference (P=0.004).
Conclusion: These findings support the histiocyte/macrophage nature of multinucleated giant cells and mononuclear cells. Overexpression and high intensity score of CD68 in mononuclear cells and the high intensity score of factor VIII-RA in endothelial cells represent less aggressive behavior in central giant cell granuloma.
Similar articles
-
Immunohistochemical comparison of p53, Ki-67, CD68, vimentin, α-smooth muscle actin and alpha-1-antichymotry-psin in oral peripheral and central giant cell granuloma.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Jan 1;16(1):20-4. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1629. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015. PMID: 25876945
-
A comparative immunohistochemical evaluation of CD68 and TRAP protein expression in central and peripheral giant cell granulomas of the jaws.J Oral Pathol Med. 2011 Apr;40(4):334-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2010.00944.x. Epub 2010 Oct 4. J Oral Pathol Med. 2011. PMID: 21029180
-
Cytomorphometric and immunohistochemical comparison between central and peripheral giant cell lesions of the jaws.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 May;105(5):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.032. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008. PMID: 18299236
-
Hybrid Central Odontogenic Fibroma with Giant Cell Granuloma like Lesion: A Report of Three Additional Cases and Review of the Literature.Head Neck Pathol. 2018 Jun;12(2):166-174. doi: 10.1007/s12105-017-0845-7. Epub 2017 Aug 7. Head Neck Pathol. 2018. PMID: 28785965 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Central giant cell granuloma.Aust Endod J. 2002 Apr;28(1):18-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2002.tb00362.x. Aust Endod J. 2002. PMID: 12360677 Review.
Cited by
-
Expression sites of immunohistochemistry markers in oral diseases - A scoping review.J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2022 Oct-Dec;26(4):524-533. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_364_22. Epub 2022 Dec 22. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2022. PMID: 37082070 Free PMC article.
-
Unravelling the role of immunohistochemistry in giant cell lesions of jaws: A systematic review.J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2023 Jan-Mar;27(1):181-194. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_18_22. Epub 2023 Mar 21. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2023. PMID: 37234327 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical