Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;25(11):1237-1245.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.132. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

Uptake of genetic testing by the children of Lynch syndrome variant carriers across three generations

Affiliations

Uptake of genetic testing by the children of Lynch syndrome variant carriers across three generations

Toni T Seppälä et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Many Lynch syndrome (LS) carriers remain unidentified, thus missing early cancer detection and prevention opportunities. Tested probands should inform their relatives about cancer risk and options for genetic counselling and predictive gene testing, but many fail to undergo testing. To assess predictive testing uptake and demographic factors influencing this decision in LS families, a cross-sectional registry-based cohort study utilizing the Finnish Lynch syndrome registry was undertaken. Tested LS variant probands (1184) had 2068 children divided among three generations: 660 parents and 1324 children (first), 445 and 667 (second), and 79 and 77 (third). Of children aged >18 years, 801 (67.4%), 146 (43.2%), and 5 (23.8%), respectively, were genetically tested. Together, 539 first-generation LS variant carriers had 2068 children and grandchildren (3.84 per carrier). Of the 1548 (2.87 per carrier) eligible children, 952 (61.5%) were tested (1.77 per carrier). In multivariate models, age (OR 1.08 per year; 95% CI 1.06-1.10), family gene (OR 2.83; 1.75-4.57 for MLH1 and 2.59; 1.47-4.56 for MSH2 compared with MSH6), one or more tested siblings (OR 6.60; 4.82-9.03), no siblings (OR 4.63; 2.64-8.10), and parent under endoscopic surveillance (OR 5.22; 2.41-11.31) were independent predictors of having genetic testing. Examples of parental adherence to regular surveillance and genetically tested siblings strongly influenced children at 50% risk of LS to undergo predictive gene testing. High numbers of untested, adult at-risk individuals exist even among well-established cohorts of known LS families with good adherence to endoscopic surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowcharts of (a) first generation, (b) second generation, and (c) third generation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of children of carriers in each generation grouped by age. The separated portion of each bar represents the percentage tested within the group.

References

    1. Møller P, Seppälä T, Bernstein I et al: Cancer incidence and survival in Lynch syndrome patients receiving colonoscopic and gynaecological surveillance: first report from the prospective Lynch syndrome database. Gut 2017; 66: 464–472. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hampel H, la Chapelle de A: The search for unaffected individuals with Lynch syndrome: do the ends justify the means? Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011; 4: 1–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vasen HFA, Blanco I, Aktán-Collán K et al: Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts. Gut 2013; 62: 812–823. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giardiello FM, Allen JI, Axilbund JE et al: Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1159–1179. - PubMed
    1. Stoffel EM, Mangu PB, Gruber SB et al: Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of the Familial Risk-Colorectal Cancer: European Society for Medical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2014; 11: e437–e441. - PubMed

Publication types