Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Jun;72(6):737-748.
doi: 10.1111/anae.13786. Epub 2017 Feb 19.

Pain Assessment in INTensive care (PAINT): an observational study of physician-documented pain assessment in 45 intensive care units in the United Kingdom

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Pain Assessment in INTensive care (PAINT): an observational study of physician-documented pain assessment in 45 intensive care units in the United Kingdom

H I Kemp et al. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Pain is a common and distressing symptom experienced by intensive care patients. Assessing pain in this environment is challenging, and published guidelines have been inconsistently implemented. The Pain Assessment in INTensive care (PAINT) study aimed to evaluate the frequency and type of physician pain assessments with respect to published guidelines. This observational service evaluation considered all pain and analgesia-related entries in patients' records over a 24-h period, in 45 adult intensive care units (ICUs) in London and the South-East of England. Data were collected from 750 patients, reflecting the practice of 362 physicians. Nearly two-thirds of patients (n = 475, 64.5%, 95%CI 60.9-67.8%) received no physician-documented pain assessment during the 24-h study period. Just under one-third (n = 215, 28.6%, 95%CI 25.5-32.0%) received no nursing-documented pain assessment, and over one-fifth (n = 159, 21.2%, 95%CI 19.2-23.4)% received neither a doctor nor a nursing pain assessment. Two of the 45 ICUs used validated behavioural pain assessment tools. The likelihood of receiving a physician pain assessment was affected by the following factors: the number of nursing assessments performed; whether the patient was admitted as a surgical patient; the presence of tracheal tube or tracheostomy; and the length of stay in ICU. Physician-documented pain assessments in the majority of participating ICUs were infrequent and did not utilise recommended behavioural pain assessment tools. Further research to identify factors influencing physician pain assessment behaviour in ICU, such as human factors or cultural attitudes, is urgently needed.

Keywords: critical care; intensive care unit; pain assessment; pain terms; physicians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of intensive care unit and patient recruitment. PLAN; Pan‐London Peri‐operative Audit and Research Network; SEARCH; South‐East Anaesthetic Research Chain.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pain assessment tools used by physicians. NRS, numerical rating scale; BPS, behavioural pain scale; CPOT, critical care pain observation tool. *737 of the 750 patients had complete case report forms regarding physician pain‐assessment documentation.

References

    1. Chanques G, Sebbane M, Barbotte E, Viel E, Eledjamm JJ, Jaber S. A prospective study of pain at rest: incidence and characteristics of an unrecognized symptom in surgical and trauma versus medical intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 858–60. - PubMed
    1. Chanques G, Jaber S, Barbotte E, et al. Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine 2006; 34: 1691–9. - PubMed
    1. Gélinas C. Management of pain in cardiac surgery ICU patients: have we improved over time? Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 2007; 23: 298–303. - PubMed
    1. Desbiens NA, Wu AW, Broste SK, et al. Pain and satisfaction with pain control in seriously ill hospitalized adults: findings from the SUPPORT research investigations. For the SUPPORT investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Critical Care Medicine 1996; 24: 1953–61. - PubMed
    1. Laycock H, Ward S, Halmshaw C, Nagy I, Bantel C. Pain in intensive care: a personalised healthcare approach. Journal of the Intensive Care Society 2013; 14: 2–8.

Publication types

MeSH terms