Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Oct 10;136(15):1362-1373.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026858. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

Prolonged, Uninterrupted Sedentary Behavior and Glycemic Biomarkers Among US Hispanic/Latino Adults: The HCHS/SOL (Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Prolonged, Uninterrupted Sedentary Behavior and Glycemic Biomarkers Among US Hispanic/Latino Adults: The HCHS/SOL (Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos)

Keith M Diaz et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: Excessive sedentary time is ubiquitous in developed nations and is associated with deleterious health outcomes. Few studies have examined whether the manner in which sedentary time is accrued (in short or long bouts) carries any clinical relevance. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of prolonged, uninterrupted sedentary behavior with glycemic biomarkers in a cohort of US Hispanic/Latino adults.

Methods: We studied 12 083 participants from the HCHS/SOL (Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos), a population-based study of Hispanic/Latino adults 18 to 74 years of age. Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and glycosylated hemoglobin were measured from a fasting blood sample, and 2-hour glucose was measured after an oral glucose tolerance test. Sedentary time was objectively measured with a hip-mounted accelerometer. Prolonged, uninterrupted sedentariness was expressed as mean sedentary bout length.

Results: After adjustment for potential confounders and moderate to vigorous physical activity, longer sedentary bout duration was dose-dependently associated with increased homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (P for trend<0.001) and 2-hour glucose levels (P for trend=0.015). These associations were not independent of total sedentary time; however, a significant interaction between sedentary bout duration and total sedentary time was observed. Evaluation of the joint association of total sedentary time and sedentary bout duration showed that participants in the upper quartile for both sedentary characteristics (ie, high total sedentary time and high sedentary bout duration) had the highest levels of homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (P<0.001 versus low group for both sedentary characteristics) and 2-hour glucose (P=0.002 versus low group for both sedentary characteristics). High total sedentary time or high sedentary bout duration alone were not associated with differences in any glycemic biomarkers.

Conclusions: Accruing sedentary time in prolonged, uninterrupted bouts may be deleteriously associated with biomarkers of glucose regulation.

Keywords: Hispanic Americans; epidemiology; exercise; glucose; sedentary lifestyle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Joint associations of total sedentary time and prolonged, uninterrupted sedentary bouts with glycemic biomarkers
Panel A, HOMA-IR (Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance); Panel B, 2-hour glucose. Models adjusted for age, sex, study center, Hispanic background, education level, annual household income, employment status, birthplace outside of U.S., smoking, alcohol drinking, AHEI-2010 score, SF-12 physical score, SF-12 mental score, antidiabetic medication, health insurance, healthcare utilization, and moderate-vigorous physical activity. High and low groups were defined as quartile 4 and quartiles 1–3, respectively, for each sedentary characteristic. The sample size for each group were as follows: low total sedentary time/low sedentary bout time (n=8,467), high total sedentary time/low sedentary bout time (n=595), low total sedentary time, high sedentary bout time (n=595), high total sedentary time/high sedentary bout time (n=2,426). The interaction between total sedentary time and mean sedentary bout duration was significant for HOMA-IR (p = 0.017) and 2-hour glucose (p=0.021).

References

    1. Archer E, Shook RP, Thomas DM, Church TS, Katzmarzyk PT, Hebert JR, McIver KL, Hand GA, Lavie CJ, Blair SN. 45-year trends in women’s use of time and household management energy expenditure. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56620. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, Rodarte RQ, Martin CK, Blair SN, Bouchard C. Trends over 5 decades in u.S. Occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19657. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunstan DW, Howard B, Healy GN, Owen N. Too much sitting--a health hazard. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;97:368–376. - PubMed
    1. Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, Bajaj RR, Silver MA, Mitchell MS, Alter DA. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:123–132. - PubMed
    1. Strurt D, Nordstrom T. Is sitting the new smoking? [on June 15, 2016];Forbes. 2015 Jan 13; retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidsturt/2015/01/13/is-sitting-the-new-smo....