Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;207(2):481-487.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300191. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

Dissecting Causal Pathways Using Mendelian Randomization with Summarized Genetic Data: Application to Age at Menarche and Risk of Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Dissecting Causal Pathways Using Mendelian Randomization with Summarized Genetic Data: Application to Age at Menarche and Risk of Breast Cancer

Stephen Burgess et al. Genetics. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Mendelian randomization is the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables to estimate causal effects of risk factors on outcomes. The total causal effect of a risk factor is the change in the outcome resulting from intervening on the risk factor. This total causal effect may potentially encompass multiple mediating mechanisms. For a proposed mediator, the direct effect of the risk factor is the change in the outcome resulting from a change in the risk factor, keeping the mediator constant. A difference between the total effect and the direct effect indicates that the causal pathway from the risk factor to the outcome acts at least in part via the mediator (an indirect effect). Here, we show that Mendelian randomization estimates of total and direct effects can be obtained using summarized data on genetic associations with the risk factor, mediator, and outcome, potentially from different data sources. We perform simulations to test the validity of this approach when there is unmeasured confounding and/or bidirectional effects between the risk factor and mediator. We illustrate this method using the relationship between age at menarche and risk of breast cancer, with body mass index (BMI) as a potential mediator. We show an inverse direct causal effect of age at menarche on risk of breast cancer (independent of BMI), and a positive indirect effect via BMI. In conclusion, multivariable Mendelian randomization using summarized genetic data provides a rapid and accessible analytic strategy that can be undertaken using publicly available data to better understand causal mechanisms.

Keywords: Mendelian randomization; causal inference; direct effect; instrumental variable; mediation analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total effect of risk factor on outcome comprises an indirect effect (hollow arrows) via mediator, and a direct effect (solid arrow) via other pathways.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphical diagram of relationships between risk factor (X), mediator (M), outcome (Y), and genetic variant (Gj). Causal relationships between variables are indicated by solid lines. Associations of the genetic variant are indicated by dashed lines. The direct effect θD=θ2. The indirect effect θI=θ1θ3. The total effect θT=θD+θI=θ2+θ1θ3.

References

    1. Baer H. J., Tworoger S. S., Hankinson S. E., Willett W. C., 2010. Body fatness at young ages and risk of breast cancer throughout life. Am. J. Epidemiol. 171: 1183–1194. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowden J., Davey Smith G., Burgess S., 2015. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int. J. Epidemiol. 44: 512–525. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowden J., Del Greco M., Minelli F., Davey C., Smith G., et al. , 2017. A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization. Stat. Med. 36: 1783–1802. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burgess S., 2017. Estimating and contextualizing the attenuation of odds ratios due to non-collapsibility. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 46: 786–804.
    1. Burgess S., CRP CHD Genetics Collaboration , 2013. Identifying the odds ratio estimated by a two-stage instrumental variable analysis with a logistic regression model. Stat. Med. 32: 4726–4747. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources