Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Sep 1;21(3):240-246.
doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170045.

Single versus sequential culture medium: which is better at improving ongoing pregnancy rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Single versus sequential culture medium: which is better at improving ongoing pregnancy rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Felipe Dieamant et al. JBRA Assist Reprod. .

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate if single medium is better than sequential medium at improving ongoing pregnancy rates in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. The data featured in this meta-analysis were extracted from four randomized controlled trials yielded from a systematic search carried out on electronic databases. The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary endpoints included clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The endpoints for ongoing pregnancy rate were also analyzed based on the time at which the embryo transfers were performed: cleavage stage (day 2/3) and/or blastocyst stage (day 5/6). There were no significant differences between single and sequential medium for clinical pregnancy (RR=1.09; 95%CI=0.83-1.44; p=0.53), ongoing pregnancy (RR=1.11; 95%CI=0.87-1.40; p=0.39), or miscarriage rates (RR=0.89; 95%CI=0.44-1.81; p=0.74). No significant difference was found for ongoing pregnancy rate (RR=1.29; 95%CI=0.93-1.78; p=0.12) between single and sequential medium when only trials in which embryos were transferred at the blastocyst stage were included. In conclusion, the choice of embryo culture approach - single or sequential medium - did not affect the ongoing pregnancy rates of patients undergoing ART cycles.

Keywords: controlled clinical trials; embryo culture techniques; meta-analysis; pregnancy; randomized.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
QUOROM statement flow diagram illustrating the selection of trials included in this meta-analysis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest plot - clinical pregnancy rate per randomized patient.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Forest plot - ongoing pregnancy rate per randomized patient.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest plot - miscarriage rate from clinical pregnancy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alteri A, Fabozzi G, Rega E, Starita MF, Giannini P, Piscitelli C, Colicchia A. Blastocyst development in single-step versus sequential culture media of the same brand: analysis of 386 sibling oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:i45–i45. doi: 10.1093/humrep/30.Supplement_1.1. - DOI
    1. Biggers JD, Summers MC. Choosing a culture medium: making informed choices. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:473–483. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campo R, Binda MM, Van Kerkhoven G, Frederickx V, Serneels A, Roziers P, Lopes AS, Gordts S, Puttemans P, Gordts S. Critical reappraisal of embryo quality as a predictive parameter for pregnancy outcome: a pilot study. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010;2:289–295. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ciray HN, Aksoy T, Goktas C, Ozturk B, Bahceci M. Time-lapse evaluation of human embryo development in single versus sequential culture media-a sibling oocyte study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:891–900. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9818-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gardner DK, Lane M. Alleviation of the '2-cell block' and development to the blastocyst of CF1 mouse embryos: role of amino acids, EDTA and physical parameters. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2703–2712. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019195. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources