Nitrogen uptake and assimilation in proliferating embryogenic cultures of Norway spruce-Investigating the specific role of glutamine
- PMID: 28837647
- PMCID: PMC5570297
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181785
Nitrogen uptake and assimilation in proliferating embryogenic cultures of Norway spruce-Investigating the specific role of glutamine
Erratum in
-
Correction: Nitrogen uptake and assimilation in proliferating embryogenic cultures of Norway spruce-Investigating the specific role of glutamine.PLoS One. 2018 Jan 19;13(1):e0191208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191208. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29351347 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Somatic embryogenesis is an in vitro system employed for plant propagation and the study of embryo development. Nitrogen is essential for plant growth and development and, hence, the production of healthy embryos during somatic embryogenesis. Glutamine has been shown to increase plant biomass in many in vitro applications, including somatic embryogenesis. However, several aspects of nitrogen nutrition during somatic embryogenesis remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated the uptake and assimilation of nitrogen in Norway spruce pro-embryogenic masses to elucidate some of these aspects. In our study, addition of glutamine had a more positive effect on growth than inorganic nitrogen. The nitrogen uptake appeared to be regulated, with a strong preference for glutamine; 67% of the assimilated nitrogen in the free amino acid pool originated from glutamine-nitrogen. Glutamine addition also relieved the apparently limited metabolism (as evidenced by the low concentration of free amino acids) of pro-embryogenic masses grown on inorganic nitrogen only. The unusually high alanine concentration in the presence of glutamine, suggests that alanine biosynthesis was involved in alleviating these constraints. These findings inspire further studies of nitrogen nutrition during the somatic embryogenesis process; identifying the mechanism(s) that govern glutamine enhancement of pro-embryogenic masses growth is especially important in this regard.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures





References
-
- Dodeman VL, Ducreux G, Kreis M. Zygotic embryogenesis versus somatic embryogenesis. J Exp Bot. 1997;48(313):1493–1509. doi: 10.1093/jxb/48.8.1493 - DOI
-
- Chalupa W. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from cultured immature and mature embryos of Picea abies (L.) Karst. Communication Institute of Forestry Czech. 1985;14:57–63.
-
- Hakman I, Fowke LC, von Arnold S, Eriksson T. The development of somatic embryos in tissue cultures initiated from immature embryos of Picea abies (Norway spruce). Plant Science 1985;38(1):38–59. doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(85)90079-2 - DOI
-
- von Arnold S, Sabala I, Bozhkov P, Dyachok J, Filonova L. Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2002;69(3):233–249. doi: 10.1023/A:1015673200621 - DOI
-
- Nehra N, Becwar M, Rottmann W, Pearson L, Chowdhury K, Chang S, et al. Forest biotechnology: Innovative methods, emerging opportunities. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant. 2005;41(6):701–717. doi: 10.1079/IVP2005691 - DOI