Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Clinical Outcomes and Risk of Recurrence
- PMID: 28838364
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.053
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Clinical Outcomes and Risk of Recurrence
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is underdiagnosed and an important cause of myocardial infarction (MI), especially in young women. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes, including recurrent SCAD, are inadequately reported.
Objectives: This study sought to describe the acute and long-term cardiovascular outcomes and assess the predictors of recurrent SCAD.
Methods: Nonatherosclerotic SCAD patients were prospectively followed at Vancouver General Hospital systematically to ascertain baseline, predisposing and precipitating stressors, angiographic features, revascularization, use of medication, and in-hospital and long-term cardiovascular events. Clinical predictors for recurrent de novo SCAD were tested using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models.
Results: The authors prospectively followed 327 SCAD patients. Average age was 52.5 ± 9.6 years, and 90.5% were women (56.9% postmenopausal). All presented with MI; 25.7% had ST-segment elevation MI, 74.3% had non-ST-segment elevation MI, and 8.9% had ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. Precipitating emotional stressors were reported in 48.3% and physical stressors in 28.1%. Fibromuscular dysplasia was present in 62.7%, connective tissue disorder in 4.9%, and systemic inflammatory disease in 11.9%. The majority (83.1%) were initially treated medically, with only 16.5% or 2.2% undergoing in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, respectively. The majority of SCAD patients were taking aspirin and beta-blocker therapy at discharge and at follow-up. Median hospital stay was 3.0 days, and the overall major adverse event rate was 7.3%. Median long-term follow-up was 3.1 years, and overall major adverse cardiac event rate was 19.9% (death rate: 1.2%; recurrent MI: 16.8%; stroke/transient ischemic attack: 1.2%; revascularization: 5.8%). Recurrent SCAD occurred in 10.4% of patients. In multivariate modeling, only hypertension increased (hazard ratio: 2.46; p = 0.011) and beta-blocker use diminished (hazard ratio: 0.36; p = 0.004) recurrent SCAD.
Conclusions: In our large prospectively followed SCAD cohort, long-term cardiovascular events were common. Hypertension increased the risk of recurrent SCAD, whereas beta-blocker therapy appeared to be protective.
Keywords: beta-blocker; coronary angiography; fibromuscular dysplasia; hypertension; myocardial infarction; women.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Insights Into Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Can Recurrence Be Prevented?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 29;70(9):1159-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.726. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28838365 No abstract available.
-
Pregnancy-Associated Coronary Artery Dissection: A Therapeutic Dilemma.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jan 30;71(4):469-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1152. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29389369 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Pregnancy-Associated Coronary Artery Dissection: A Therapeutic Dilemma.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jan 30;71(4):470-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1154. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29389370 No abstract available.
-
Should We Recommend Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jan 30;71(4):472-473. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1153. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29389372 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Should We Recommend Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jan 30;71(4):473. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.058. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29389373 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
