Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;4(4):302-307.
doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100335. Epub 2013 Jul 6.

Variations in surgical management from a national bowel cancer screening programme

R J Codd  1 , R Thomas  2 , H Heard  3 , A G Radcliffe  3 , G L Williams  2   4 , M D Evans  1   2
Affiliations

Variations in surgical management from a national bowel cancer screening programme

R J Codd et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Population screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) was introduced to Wales in October 2008. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early impact of screening on CRC services.

Design: Prospectively collected data from the Bowel Screening Wales (BSW) programme and the Welsh Bowel Cancer Audit (WBCA) were used to identify all screen-detected (SD) CRC diagnoses in Wales between April 2009 and March 2011. Data from the WBCA were used to calculate surgical outcomes.

Results: 444 SD cancers were registered during the study period representing 11% of all CRC diagnoses. There was a 9.9% increase in CRC incidence following the introduction of the BSW. SD patients presented with earlier stage disease; SD Dukes' A 35.1% vs 13.9% symptomatic patients (p<0.001) and SD Dukes' D 7.4% vs 21.8% symptomatic, (p<0.001). There were more colonic cancers among the SD population (p<0.001). The resection rate for SD cancers was 89%, significantly higher than symptomatic cancers (67.7%; p<0.0001). There was variability in the use of polypectomy as a definitive procedure to treat CRC between units. Overall laparoscopic resection was used in 52% of cases but with considerable interunit variability (0-92%).

Conclusions: The introduction of screening has increased the workload of the colorectal multidisciplinary teams in Wales. This has occurred through both an increase in case volume and the identification of more patients with early stage disease. There is considerable interunit variability in the use of techniques of local excision and rates of laparoscopic resection that need to be addressed.

Keywords: Audit; Colorectal Cancer; Colorectal Cancer Screening; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bowel Cancer Statistics. Cancer Research UK. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/bowel/ (accessed 28 Oct 2012).
    1. Evans M, Harris M, Roberts L, et al. Cancer Services Co-ordinating Group 4th Bowel Cancer Audit Report. Bowel cancer: presentation, treatment and outcomes in Wales: April 2007–March 2008. http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/Documents/322/CSCG%5F4th%5FBowel%5FCancer... (accessed 28 Oct 2012).
    1. Towler B, Irwig L, Glasziou P, et al. A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. BMJ 1998;317:559. - PMC - PubMed
    1. UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot Team. Evaluation of the UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot. Final report 2003. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/pilot-evaluation.html (accessed 28 Oct 2012).
    1. Mella J, Biffin A, Radcliffe AG, et al. Population-based audit of colorectal cancer management in two UK health regions. Colorectal Cancer Working Group, Royal College of Surgeons of England Clinical Epidemiology and Audit Unit. Br J Surg 1997;84:1731–6. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources