Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;5(1):20-25.
doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100342. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

The role of near-patient coeliac serology testing in the follow-up of patients with coeliac disease

Affiliations

The role of near-patient coeliac serology testing in the follow-up of patients with coeliac disease

D A George et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: This pilot study was undertaken to assess the validity and effectiveness of near-patient coeliac immunological testing, compared to standard laboratory immunological techniques, used in the context of dietician-led coeliac disease follow-up clinics.

Design: The study was designed in two phases, each assessing the near-patient test and standard laboratory immunological techniques. Phase 1 analysed stored serum samples; Phase 2 analysed whole blood from patients attending the dietician-led coeliac disease clinics.

Setting: Patients were recruited from New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton (n=50), and Imperial College London (n=30), between March 2010 and February 2011.

Patients: Those with a diagnosis of coeliac disease for greater than 12 months attending dietician-led coeliac disease clinics.

Interventions: In addition to whole blood taken for routine analysis, patients required a capillary finger-prick blood sample.

Main outcome measure: To determine if the whole blood and serum near-patient test results were in correlation with outcomes of standard laboratory evaluation.

Results: Phase 1 demonstrated that the near-patient serum test had a sensitivity of 93.5% (95% CI 0.79% to 0.98%), specificity of 94.9% (0.83% to 0.99%), when compared to standard laboratory ELISA. Phase 2, involving patients whole blood, had a sensitivity of 77.8% (0.45% to 0.93%), and specificity of 100% (0.94% to 1%).

Conclusions: This pilot study has demonstrated that there appears to be a role for near-patient testing in coeliac disease, but further studies are recommended.

Keywords: Auto-Antibodies; Celiac Disease; Clinical Decision Making; Dietary Factors; Immunology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. West J, Logan RFA, Hill PG, et al. Seroprevalence, correlates, and characteristics of undetected coeliac disease in England. Gut 2003;52:960–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sollid LM, Thorsby E. HLA susceptibility genes in celiac disease: genetic mapping and role in pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 1993;105:910–22. - PubMed
    1. Ferreira M, Davies S, Butlet M, et al. Endomysial antibody: is it the best screening test for celiac disease? Gut 1992:33;1633–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lerner A, Kumar V, Iancu T. Immunological diagnosis of childhood celiac disease: comparison between antigliadin, antireticulin and antiendomysial antibodies. Clin Exp Immune 1994:95;78–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dieterich W, Ehnis T, Bauer M, et al. Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of coeliac disease. Nat Med 1997;3:797–801. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources