Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;5(3):161-166.
doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100391. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

Biliary boulders

H Steed  1 , K Lau  1 , R Glass  1 , D Durkin  2 , M Deakin  2 , J R B Green  1
Affiliations

Biliary boulders

H Steed et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones.

Design: A retrospective review of 100 consecutive ERCPs performed for CBD stones.

Results: 100 ERCPs were performed on 84 patients with a median cohort age of 77. Completion in this cohort, as defined by duct clearance, was achieved in 65% of cases. Completion rates fell rapidly after two ERCPs. 33% of the cohort had small stones <10 mm, and 67% had stones >10 mm. Size, but not number of stones, affected the completion rate and frequency of complications (16%). Presence of periampullary diverticulum did not affect completion or complication rates. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) had a 90% sensitivity for detecting CBD stones compared with 56% for CT.

Discussion and conclusions: ERCP remains a high-risk procedure with a significant complication rate when performed to deal with CBD stones. MRCP should be the second choice of investigation for CBD stones. This cohort had an unusually high number of larger stones at ERCP of 67% compared with other published UK cohorts of 8%, and this was reflected in the completion and complication rate.

Keywords: ERCP; MRCP; adverse effects; common bile duct stones; endoscopy; standards.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chatterjee S, Rees C, Dwarakanath AD, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography practice in district general hospitals in North Easth England: a Northern Regional Endoscopy Group (NREG) study. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2011;41:109–13. - PubMed
    1. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancretograph practice. Gut 2007;56:821–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams EJ, Ogollah R, Thomas P, et al. What predicts failed cannulation and therapy at ERCP? Results of a large-scale multicenter analysis. Endoscopy 2012;44:674–83. - PubMed
    1. Kochief A, Gargouri D, Kilani A, et al. Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and longterm treatment with biliary stenting. Tunis Med 2011;89:342–6. - PubMed
    1. Ang TL, Fock KM, Teo EK, et al. An audit of the outcome of long-term biliary stenting in the treatment of common bile duct stones in a general hospital. J Gastroenterol 2006;41:765–71. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources