Evolutionary biology today and the call for an extended synthesis
- PMID: 28839919
- PMCID: PMC5566807
- DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0145
Evolutionary biology today and the call for an extended synthesis
Abstract
Evolutionary theory has been extended almost continually since the evolutionary synthesis (ES), but except for the much greater importance afforded genetic drift, the principal tenets of the ES have been strongly supported. Adaptations are attributable to the sorting of genetic variation by natural selection, which remains the only known cause of increase in fitness. Mutations are not adaptively directed, but as principal authors of the ES recognized, the material (structural) bases of biochemistry and development affect the variety of phenotypic variations that arise by mutation and recombination. Against this historical background, I analyse major propositions in the movement for an 'extended evolutionary synthesis'. 'Niche construction' is a new label for a wide variety of well-known phenomena, many of which have been extensively studied, but (as with every topic in evolutionary biology) some aspects may have been understudied. There is no reason to consider it a neglected 'process' of evolution. The proposition that phenotypic plasticity may engender new adaptive phenotypes that are later genetically assimilated or accommodated is theoretically plausible; it may be most likely when the new phenotype is not truly novel, but is instead a slight extension of a reaction norm already shaped by natural selection in similar environments. However, evolution in new environments often compensates for maladaptive plastic phenotypic responses. The union of population genetic theory with mechanistic understanding of developmental processes enables more complete understanding by joining ultimate and proximate causation; but the latter does not replace or invalidate the former. Newly discovered molecular phenomena have been easily accommodated in the past by elaborating orthodox evolutionary theory, and it appears that the same holds today for phenomena such as epigenetic inheritance. In several of these areas, empirical evidence is needed to evaluate enthusiastic speculation. Evolutionary theory will continue to be extended, but there is no sign that it requires emendation.
Keywords: evolution; evolutionary synthesis; niche construction.
Conflict of interest statement
I declare I have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Why an extended evolutionary synthesis is necessary.Interface Focus. 2017 Oct 6;7(5):20170015. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2017.0015. Epub 2017 Aug 18. Interface Focus. 2017. PMID: 28839929 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions.Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 22;282(1813):20151019. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1019. Proc Biol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26246559 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A generalised approach to the study and understanding of adaptive evolution.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Feb;98(1):352-375. doi: 10.1111/brv.12910. Epub 2022 Oct 12. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023. PMID: 36223883 Free PMC article.
-
The extended evolutionary synthesis and human origins: Archaeological perspectives.Evol Anthropol. 2021 Jan;30(1):4-7. doi: 10.1002/evan.21837. Epub 2020 Jun 23. Evol Anthropol. 2021. PMID: 32574411
-
Evolutionary significance of phenotypic accommodation in novel environments: an empirical test of the Baldwin effect.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 27;364(1520):1125-41. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0285. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009. PMID: 19324617 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Predictability of Biotic Stress Structures Plant Defence Evolution.Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 May;36(5):444-456. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Jan 16. Trends Ecol Evol. 2021. PMID: 33468354 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neo-darwinism still haunts evolutionary theory: A modern perspective on Charlesworth, Lande, and Slatkin (1982).Evolution. 2021 Jun;75(6):1244-1255. doi: 10.1111/evo.14268. Epub 2021 May 30. Evolution. 2021. PMID: 33999415 Free PMC article.
-
The GRN concept as a guide for evolutionary developmental biology.J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2023 Mar;340(2):92-104. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.23132. Epub 2022 Mar 28. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2023. PMID: 35344632 Free PMC article.
-
Thomas S. Kuhn: key to a better understanding of the extended evolutionary synthesis.Theory Biosci. 2024 Feb;143(1):27-44. doi: 10.1007/s12064-023-00409-w. Epub 2023 Nov 17. Theory Biosci. 2024. PMID: 37978156
-
Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.Genetics. 2018 Aug;209(4):949-966. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.300995. Genetics. 2018. PMID: 30049818 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Huxley J. 1942. Evolution, the modern synthesis. London, UK: Allen and Unwin.
-
- Mayr E, Provine WB (eds). 1980. The evolutionary synthesis: perspectives on the unification of biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
- Fisher RA. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
-
- Haldane JBS. 1932. The causes of evolution. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous