Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 25;7(1):9486.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09863-1.

Spatial multi-scale relationships of ecosystem services: A case study using a geostatistical methodology

Affiliations

Spatial multi-scale relationships of ecosystem services: A case study using a geostatistical methodology

Yang Liu et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Adequately understanding the spatial multi-scale relationships of ecosystem services (ES) is an important step for environmental management decision-making. Here, we used spatially explicit methods to estimate five critical ES (nitrogen and phosphorous purifications, crop production, water supply and soil retention) related to non-point source (NPS) pollution in the Taihu Basin region of eastern China. Then a factorial kriging analysis and stepwise multiple regression were performed to identify the spatial multi-scale relationships of ES and their dominant factors at each scale. The spatial variations in ES were characterized at the 12 km and 83 km scales and the result indicated that the relationships of these services were scale dependent. It was inferred that at the 12 km scale, ES were controlled by anthropogenic activities and their relationships were dependent on socio-economic factors. At the 83 km scale, we suggested that ES were primarily dominated by the physical environment. Moreover, the policy implications of ES relationships and their dominant factors were discussed for the multi-level governance of NPS pollution. Overall, this study presents an optimized approach to identifying ES relationships at multiple spatial scales and illustrates how appropriate information can help guide water management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Spatial distribution of five ecosystem services in Taihu Basin, Jiangsu in 2010. Green indicates high value areas of ecosystem services, red and yellow indicate areas with low and moderate values, respectively, and blue represents water. Maps generated with ArcGIS 10.2.2 (http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Spatial components of five ecosystem services at the local scale (12 km) in Taihu Basin, Jiangsu in 2010. 1 in the legend indicates high value areas of spatial component variability, −1 in the legend indicates areas with low value variability, and blue represents water. Maps were generated with ArcGIS 10.2.2 (http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Spatial components of five ecosystem services at the regional scale (83 km) in Taihu Basin, Jiangsu in 2010. 1 in the legend indicates high value areas of spatial component variability, −1 in the legend indicates areas with low value variability, and blue represents water. Maps were generated with ArcGIS 10.2.2 (http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlation circles of principle component analysis for classical, local and regional scales.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lu YH, Liu SG, Fu BJ. Ecosystem service: from virtual reality to ground truth. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46:2492–2493. doi: 10.1021/es300475w. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tallis H, Kareiva P, Marvier M, Chang A. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:9457–9464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705797105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Costanza R, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environ.Change. 2014;26:152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002. - DOI
    1. Naidoo R, et al. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:9495–9500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707823105. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liquete C, Piroddi C, Macías D, Druon J, Zulian G. Ecosystem services sustainability in the Mediterranean Sea: assessment of status and trends using multiple modelling approaches. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:1–14. doi: 10.1038/srep34162. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources