Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;32(3):1215-1222.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5794-4. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

The natural history of perforated marginal ulcers after gastric bypass surgery

Affiliations

The natural history of perforated marginal ulcers after gastric bypass surgery

Maria S Altieri et al. Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Although perforated marginal ulcers (pMU) following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) represent a surgical emergency, the epidemiology and outcome of this condition is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate incidence of pMU following RYGB and assess the natural history of this complication.

Methods: The SPARCS administrative database was used to identify patients undergoing RYGB between 2005 and 2010. With the use of a unique identifier, we followed patients up to 2014 for subsequent admission and re-intervention (repair or revision) for perforated MU. Groups were compared using Chi square tests with exact p values based on Monte Carlo simulation, t test with unequal variances, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test when appropriate.

Results: We identified 35,080 RYGB patients; 292 patients (0.83%) developed pMU 937 (443-1546) days following RYGB [Median (Q1-Q3)]. Among these 292 patients, tobacco use was present in one-third of patients. Repair of the perforation was performed in 115 patients, while anastomotic revision was reported in 64. Patients who underwent revision were more likely to have respiratory complications. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for patients managed with RYGB revision (Median, Q1-Q3:7, 5-14, vs 6, 4-7, days, p = 0.001). Recurrence of marginal ulcer was common after either intervention (26.09% for repair and 29.69% for revision, p = 0.726).

Conclusion: Following RYGB, the incidence of pMU is small. Anastomotic revision for pMU is associated with prolonged length of stay compared to repair alone. Importantly, recurrence after intervention of pMU is common, suggesting possible value of a routine surveillance program for patients following pMU.

Keywords: Perforated marginal ulcer; Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):51-4 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2128-32 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1090-4 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;15(10):1375-8 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Jul;185(1):1-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources