Change in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Choice and Outcomes Over Time
- PMID: 28847572
- PMCID: PMC5794339
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.019
Change in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Choice and Outcomes Over Time
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze failure rate in 2-year increments to determine if graft choice changed over time and graft failure rate.
Methods: A prospective 2002-2008 database was used to identify risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) retear. Subjects who had primary ACL retear with no history of contralateral surgery and 2-year follow-up were included. Subjects who underwent a multiligament reconstruction were excluded. Graft type, age, sex, smoking status, body mass index, Marx activity level at index surgery, medial and lateral meniscus status at time of ACL retear, sport played after ACL reconstruction, and clinical site were evaluated. Analysis was repeated using 2002-2003 (early) and 2007-2008 (late) 2-year databases. Analysis of variance with post hoc analysis was performed to detect significant differences in age and Marx score by graft type over time.
Results: Two-year follow-up for graft failure was obtained on 2,497 of 2,692 (93%) subjects. There were 112 of 2,497 (4.5%) ACL retears identified at 2-year follow-up. The only predictor that changed between early/late periods was allograft use. Allograft odds ratio decreased from 13.1 to 9.5 (P < .01). Allografts were used in older patients (31-40 years) and with lower Marx scores (10-8) from early to late periods. The mean age of subjects who received bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts did not significantly change over time (22.8-23.5). The mean age of subjects who received hamstring autografts fell (27.9-25.5). The mean age of subjects who received allografts rose significantly (31.3-39.8, P < .01). The mean Marx score of subjects who received bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring autografts did not significantly change over time. The mean Marx score of subjects who received allografts decreased significantly (P < .01).
Conclusions: After early recognition, allograft use in young active patients was a risk factor for retear; graft choice by surgeons changed in the late period to use of allografts in older and less-active patients, which correlated with a significant decrease in retear risk.
Level of evidence: Level III, case control study.
Copyright © 2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Agel J, Arendt EA, Bershadsky B. Anterior cruciate ligament injury in national collegiate athletic association basketball and soccer: a 13-year review. The American journal of sports medicine. 2005;33:524–530. - PubMed
-
- Anderson AF, Dome DC, Gautam S, Awh MH, Rennirt GW. Correlation of anthropometric measurements, strength, anterior cruciate ligament size, and intercondylar notch characteristics to sex differences in anterior cruciate ligament tear rates. The American journal of sports medicine. 2001;29:58–66. - PubMed
-
- Arendt E, Dick R. Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegiate basketball and soccer. NCAA data and review of literature. The American journal of sports medicine. 1995;23:694–701. - PubMed
-
- Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell FE., Jr Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. The American journal of sports medicine. 2004;32:1986–1995. - PubMed
-
- Poehling GG, Curl WW, Lee CA, et al. Analysis of outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament repair with 5-year follow-up: allograft versus autograft. Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 2005;21:774–785. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials