Do the 'brain dead' merely appear to be alive?
- PMID: 28848063
- PMCID: PMC5749302
- DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103867
Do the 'brain dead' merely appear to be alive?
Abstract
The established view regarding 'brain death' in medicine and medical ethics is that patients determined to be dead by neurological criteria are dead in terms of a biological conception of death, not a philosophical conception of personhood, a social construction or a legal fiction. Although such individuals show apparent signs of being alive, in reality they are (biologically) dead, though this reality is masked by the intervention of medical technology. In this article, we argue that an appeal to the distinction between appearance and reality fails in defending the view that the 'brain dead' are dead. Specifically, this view relies on an inaccurate and overly simplistic account of the role of medical technology in the physiology of a 'brain dead' patient. We conclude by offering an explanation of why the conventional view on 'brain death', though mistaken, continues to be endorsed in light of its connection to organ transplantation and the dead donor rule.
Keywords: death; definition/determination of death.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Complexity of defining death: organismal death does not mean the cessation of all biological life.J Med Ethics. 2017 Nov;43(11):754-755. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104363. Epub 2017 Aug 26. J Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28844057 No abstract available.
-
What sort of death matters?J Med Ethics. 2017 Nov;43(11):727-728. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104611. J Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 29066601 No abstract available.
-
Organismal death, the dead-donor rule and the ethics of vital organ procurement.J Med Ethics. 2018 Dec;44(12):868-871. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104796. Epub 2018 Jun 19. J Med Ethics. 2018. PMID: 29921617
-
An unquestioned assumption in the debate on the dead donor rule.J Med Ethics. 2018 Dec;44(12):872-873. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104979. Epub 2018 Aug 13. J Med Ethics. 2018. PMID: 30104201 No abstract available.
References
-
- Green MB, Wikler D. Brain death and personal identity. Philos Public Aff 1980;9:105–33. - PubMed
-
- McMahan J. The ethics of killing: problems at the margins of Life. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2002.
-
- Persons LJP. Humanity, and the definition of death. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.
-
- Brody BA. How much of the brain must be dead? : Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, Schapiro R, The definition of death: contemporary controversies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999:71–82.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical