Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug;6(4):239-245.
doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2016.12.05.

Setting up a robotic hepatectomy program: a Western-European experience and perspective

Affiliations
Review

Setting up a robotic hepatectomy program: a Western-European experience and perspective

Carolijn L Nota et al. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Currently the majority of liver resections are performed via open resection. Nevertheless, minimally invasive liver surgery is gaining ground and conventional laparoscopy has proven to be beneficial in different fields of liver surgery compared to open resections. Still, conventional laparoscopy has a few downsides, from which straight instruments, 2-dimensional view and awkward ergonomics are the most obvious. The robotic surgical system is developed to overcome these limitations. It offers several advantages over conventional laparoscopy to optimize conditions in minimally invasive surgery: instruments are wristed with a wide range of motion and the view is 3-dimensional and magnified. With instruments with a greater range of motion than in laparoscopic surgery, the use of a robotic system potentially broadens indications for minimally invasive liver resection. Here, we discuss the steps of setting up a robotic hepatectomy program against the background of the initial experience at our institution.

Keywords: Robotic hepatectomy; minimally invasive liver surgery; set-up of a robotic program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CT-scan, port placement and closed incisions of a patient who underwent a resection of a posterior segment.

Comment in

References

    1. Ocuin LM, Tsung A. Minimally Invasive Hepatic Surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2016;96:299-313. 10.1016/j.suc.2015.12.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, et al. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg 2013;258:554-9; discussion 559-62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, Abu Hilal M, et al. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery for benign and malignant disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;13:227-38. 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.17 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing. Ann Surg 2016;263:761-77. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001413 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, et al. Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 2011;146:348-56. 10.1001/archsurg.2010.248 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources