Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1987 May;46(5):398-402.
doi: 10.1136/ard.46.5.398.

Effect of sulphasalazine on the radiological progression of rheumatoid arthritis

Clinical Trial

Effect of sulphasalazine on the radiological progression of rheumatoid arthritis

T Pullar et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 1987 May.

Abstract

We have investigated the influence of sulphasalazine, a second line antirheumatic drug, on the radiological progression of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis over a two year period in 41 patients. Hand radiograph scores deteriorated significantly over this period, but in a group of 31 patients in whom one year films were also available this deterioration was limited to the first year. This slowing of radiological deterioration was not related to 'normalisation' of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Compared with a 'control' group of 10 patients who had refused offers of second line therapy, sulphasalazine treated patients showed less deterioration over the two year period, and this difference was more marked than in previous studies of gold or penicillamine. No significant change was seen in large joint radiographs in sulphasalazine treated patients over two years, but this probably represents the poor sensitivity of the method of assessment. No significant correlation was seen between changes in inflammatory indices and slowing of radiological deterioration in erosion score. Thus sulphasalazine appears to slow the progression of radiological disease of the hands over the second year of treatment in a representative sample of patients who continue to receive treatment for two years.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1977 Jul;18(4):481-91 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1980 Feb 16;280(6212):442-4 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 1982 Jan-Feb;9(1):36-45 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1982 Jul-Aug;8:169-72 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Oct 15;287(6399):1099-102 - PubMed

Publication types