One, two or three dimensions of work engagement? Testing the factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale on a sample of Polish employees
- PMID: 28849984
- DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1371958
One, two or three dimensions of work engagement? Testing the factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale on a sample of Polish employees
Abstract
Work engagement, as conceptualized by the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), is a work-related positive state of mind that is characterized by vigour, dedication and absorption; however, it still remains unclear how many dimensions work engagement comprises. This study tested the factorial validity of 11 different UWES factorial models that are available in the literature using a confirmatory factor analysis approach on a large sample of multi-occupational Polish employees (N = 1420). The two-factor UWES-6, comprising vigour and dedication, was found to be reliable and remained invariant across samples drawn from four different organizational positions. It also presented a better fit than the three-factor UWES-9, which is a scale used as a standard in contemporary research on work engagement. The findings suggest that the three-factor UWES-9 might not be an optimal measure of work engagement in Poland.
Keywords: Polish; UWES; Utrecht Work Engagement Scale; confirmatory factor analysis; factorial validity; work engagement.
Similar articles
-
Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool - A literature review.Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Mar 30;30(2):161-175. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947. Epub 2017 Feb 17. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017. PMID: 28366949 Review.
-
Factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) across occupational groups in Norway.Scand J Psychol. 2010 Aug;51(4):326-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00770.x. Epub 2009 Dec 14. Scand J Psychol. 2010. PMID: 20015117
-
Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12157. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12157. J Occup Health. 2020. PMID: 32827229 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring engagement at work: validation of the Chinese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.Int J Behav Med. 2012 Sep;19(3):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9173-6. Int J Behav Med. 2012. PMID: 21681564 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric Properties of Spanish Version Student Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-S-9) in High-school Students.Span J Psychol. 2019 May 13;22:E21. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.25. Span J Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31079593
Cited by
-
Having the Cake and Eating It Too: First-Order, Second-Order and Bifactor Representations of Work Engagement.Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 22;12:615581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615581. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34366951 Free PMC article.
-
Nurses' assessed self-efficacy levels to medical asepsis and their relation to structural empowerment, work engagement and work-related stress.Work. 2023;74(2):501-513. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211305. Work. 2023. PMID: 36314182 Free PMC article.
-
Current status and influencing factors of nurses' work engagement in Chinese tertiary hospitals: A latent profile analysis.PLoS One. 2025 Apr 3;20(4):e0321398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321398. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40179069 Free PMC article.
-
Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the 9-Item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in a Multi-Occupational Female Sample: A Cross-Sectional Study.Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 6;10:2771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02771. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31866921 Free PMC article.
-
Teleworking, Work Engagement, and Intention to Quit during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Same Storm, Different Boats?Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 24;19(3):1267. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031267. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35162291 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources