Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan/Feb;10(1):19-30.
doi: 10.1177/1941738117727736. Epub 2017 Aug 29.

Prohibited Contaminants in Dietary Supplements

Affiliations
Review

Prohibited Contaminants in Dietary Supplements

Neilson M Mathews. Sports Health. 2018 Jan/Feb.

Abstract

Context: With the increasing use of unregulated dietary supplements, athletes are at continued risk from adverse medical events and inadvertent doping.

Evidence acquisition: A review of Clinical Key, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases from 2012 to 2017 was performed using search terms, including dietary supplement, contamination, doping in athletes, inadvertent doping, and prohibited substances. The references of pertinent articles were reviewed for other relevant sources.

Study design: Clinical review.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Results: Poor manufacturing processes and intentional contamination with many banned substances continue to occur in dietary supplements sold in the United States. Certain sectors, such as weight loss and muscle-building supplements, pose a greater threat because they are more likely to be contaminated.

Conclusion: Athletes will continue to be at risk for adverse events and failed doping tests due to contaminated dietary supplements until legislation changes how they are regulated. In the interim, there are several steps that can be taken to mitigate this risk, including improved education of medical staff and athletes and use of third party-certified products.

Keywords: dietary supplements; inadvertent doping; prohibited contaminants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author reports no potential conflicts of interest in the development and publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Designer steroid cycle. AAS, anabolic-androgenic steroid; DEA, Drug Enforcement Administration; FDA, Food and Drug Administration.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Steroid hormone cascade (used with permission from Brett Osborn). DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Seals for third-party certification companies.
None

References

    1. Abbate V, Kicman AT, Evans-Brown M, et al. Anabolic steroids detected in bodybuilding dietary supplements - a significant risk to public health. Drug Test Anal. 2015;7:609-618. - PubMed
    1. Akabas SR, Vannice G, Atwater JB, Cooperman T, Cotter R, Thomas L. Quality certification programs for dietary supplements. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116:1370-1379. - PubMed
    1. Anderson JM. Evaluating the athlete’s claim of an unintentional positive urine drug test. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2011;10:191-196. - PubMed
    1. Arndt T, Claussen U, Güssregen B, et al. Kratom alkaloids and O-desmethyltramadol in urine of a “Krypton” herbal mixture consumer. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;208:47-52. - PubMed
    1. Ashar BH. The dietary supplement health and education act: time for a reassessment: comment on “acute selenium toxicity associated with a dietary supplement.” Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:261-263. - PubMed