A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 28851403
- PMCID: PMC5576102
- DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2
A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer is primarily intended to reduce local recurrence rates by downstaging tumours, enabling an improved likelihood of curative resection. However, in a subset of patients complete tumour regression occurs implying that no viable tumour is present within the surgical specimen. This raises the possibility that surgery may have been avoided. It is also recognised that response to CRT is a key determinant of prognosis. Recent radiological advances enable this response to be assessed pre-operatively using the MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG). Potentially, this allows modification of the baseline MRI-derived treatment strategy. Hence, in a 'good' mrTRG responder, with little or no evidence of tumour, surgery may be deferred. Conversely, a 'poor response' identifies an adverse prognostic group which may benefit from additional pre-operative therapy.
Methods/design: TRIGGER is a multicentre, open, interventional, randomised control feasibility study with an embedded phase III design. Patients with MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma deemed to require CRT will be eligible for recruitment. During CRT, patients will be randomised (1:2) between conventional management, according to baseline MRI, versus mrTRG-directed management. The primary endpoint of the feasibility phase is to assess the rate of patient recruitment and randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the rate of unit recruitment, acute drug toxicity, reproducibility of mrTRG reporting, surgical morbidity, pathological circumferential resection margin involvement, pathology regression grade, residual tumour cell density and surgical/specimen quality rates. The phase III trial will focus on long-term safety, regrowth rates, oncological survival analysis, quality of life and health economics analysis.
Discussion: The TRIGGER trial aims to determine whether patients with locally advanced rectal cancer can be recruited and subsequently randomised into a control trial that offers MRI-directed patient management according to radiological response to CRT (mrTRG). The feasibility study will inform a phase III trial design investigating stratified treatment of good and poor responders according to 3-year disease-free survival, colostomy-free survival as well as an increase in cases managed without a major resection.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02704520 . Registered on 5 February 2016.
Keywords: Chemoradiotherapy; Complete response; Randomised control trial; Rectal cancer; Tumour cell density; Tumour regression; mrTRG.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
National Research Ethics Committee approval was granted by London – Surrey Borders Research Ethics Committee (REC) on 18 December 2015 (15/LO/1836). The REC issued centralised ethics committee approval in all UK centres. The conduct of the trial has been, and will continue to be, in accordance with the clinical trials regulations, the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. A prerequisite to recruiting each patient to trial has been, and will continue to be, signed informed consent to participate.
Version 5.0 of the full trial protocol, including the appendices for the delivery and assessment of all applicable imaging techniques, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and pathology are available as supporting documents; however, publication of supporting raw data is currently not applicable.
Consent for publication
Informed written consent was received for publication of the manuscript and figures. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients to participate and for publication of their individual details and accompanying anonymised images in this manuscript. The consent form is held by the Royal Marsden Trials Unit and is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief.
Competing interests
Professor David Cunningham receives research income from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Merrimack, Medimmune, Merck Serono and Sanofi. Prof Phil Quirke has pharmaceutical research contracts with Roche/Ventana and Eisai, and is a member of an advisory board with AMGEN. All other authors have no conflicts of interest.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer (the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study): final results of the multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):979-89. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00159-X. Epub 2015 Jul 15. Lancet Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26189067 Clinical Trial.
-
Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):29-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30555-6. Epub 2020 Dec 7. Lancet Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33301740 Clinical Trial.
-
Relationship Between Baseline Rectal Tumor Length and Magnetic Resonance Tumor Regression Grade Response to Chemoradiotherapy: A Subanalysis of the TRIGGER Feasibility Study.Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;30(8):4729-4735. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11914-5. Epub 2022 Jun 30. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 35771366 Free PMC article.
-
The concept and use of the neoadjuvant rectal score as a composite endpoint in rectal cancer.Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):e314-e326. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00053-X. Epub 2021 May 25. Lancet Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34048686 Review.
-
Prognostic value of tumour regression grade in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jul;20(7):574-585. doi: 10.1111/codi.14106. Epub 2018 May 8. Colorectal Dis. 2018. PMID: 29582537
Cited by
-
Response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer using modern MR imaging: a pictorial review.Insights Imaging. 2019 Feb 13;10(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0706-x. Insights Imaging. 2019. PMID: 30758688 Free PMC article. Review.
-
MRI response rate after short-course radiotherapy on rectal cancer in the elderly comorbid patient: results from a retrospective cohort study.Radiat Oncol. 2020 Mar 2;15(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01500-y. Radiat Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32122381 Free PMC article.
-
Modern MR Imaging Technology in Rectal Cancer; There Is More Than Meets the Eye.Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 8;10:537532. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.537532. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33117678 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The measurement and modification of hypoxia in colorectal cancer: overlooked but not forgotten.Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2022 Aug 25;10:goac042. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goac042. eCollection 2022. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2022. PMID: 36032656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Can less be more? Organ preservation strategies in the management of rectal cancer.Curr Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(Suppl 1):S16-S23. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5841. Epub 2019 Nov 1. Curr Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31819706 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials