Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 12;114(37):9843-9847.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702155114. Epub 2017 Aug 29.

Empathy and well-being correlate with centrality in different social networks

Affiliations

Empathy and well-being correlate with centrality in different social networks

Sylvia A Morelli et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Individuals benefit from occupying central roles in social networks, but little is known about the psychological traits that predict centrality. Across four college freshman dorms (n = 193), we characterized individuals with a battery of personality questionnaires and also asked them to nominate dorm members with whom they had different types of relationships. This revealed several social networks within dorm communities with differing characteristics. In particular, additional data showed that networks varied in the degree to which nominations depend on (i) trust and (ii) shared fun and excitement. Networks more dependent upon trust were further defined by fewer connections than those more dependent on fun. Crucially, network and personality features interacted to predict individuals' centrality: people high in well-being (i.e., life satisfaction and positive emotion) were central to networks characterized by fun, whereas people high in empathy were central to networks characterized by trust. Together, these findings provide network-based corroboration of psychological evidence that well-being is socially attractive, whereas empathy supports close relationships. More broadly, these data highlight how an individual's personality relates to the roles that they play in sustaining their community.

Keywords: centrality; empathy; personality; social networks; well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Standardized factor loadings and significant factor correlations (P < 0.05) for the four-factor solution for all measures of empathy, well-being, and negative emotion.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
(Top) The strength of the relationship between each trait and indegree (as indexed by the average standardized betas from Table 1) for networks that were considered higher vs. lower in trust. (Bottom) The strength of the relationship between each trait and indegree for networks that were considered higher vs. lower in fun and excitement.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
(Top) A network map of one dorm shows that students with more nominations (i.e., larger nodes) for the question “Who usually makes you feel positive (e.g., happy, enthusiastic)?” also tend to rank higher on trait positive emotion. (Bottom) A network map of the same dorm shows that students with more nominations for the question “Who do you turn to when something bad happens?” also tend to rank higher on trait empathy. Note that all analyses were conducted with continuous trait measures and that median splits are used here only for illustrative purposes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jackson MO. Social and Economic Networks. Princeton Univ Press; Princeton: 2008.
    1. Klein KJ, Lim B-C, Saltz JL, Mayer DM. How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Acad Manage J. 2004;47:952–963.
    1. Kilduff M, Krackhardt D. Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Acad Manage J. 1994;37:87–108.
    1. Hanneman RA, Riddle M. Introduction to Social Network Methods. University of California; Riverside, CA: 2005.
    1. Taylor SE. Oxford Handbook of Health Psychology. Oxford Univ Press; New York: 2010. Social support: A review.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources