Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 29;7(1):9738.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08554-1.

Microbial communities with distinct denitrification potential in spruce and beech soils differing in nitrate leaching

Affiliations

Microbial communities with distinct denitrification potential in spruce and beech soils differing in nitrate leaching

Jiří Bárta et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Nitrogen leaching owing to elevated acid deposition remains the main ecosystem threat worldwide. We aimed to contribute to the understanding of the highly variable nitrate losses observed in Europe after acid deposition retreat. Our study proceeded in adjacent beech and spruce forests undergoing acidification recovery and differing in nitrate leaching. We reconstructed soil microbial functional characteristics connected with nitrogen and carbon cycling based on community composition. Our results showed that in the more acidic spruce soil with high carbon content, where Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria were abundant (Proteo:Acido = 1.3), the potential for nitrate reduction and loss via denitrification was high (denitrification: dissimilative nitrogen reduction to ammonium (DNRA) = 3). In the less acidic beech stand with low carbon content, but high nitrogen availability, Proteobacteria were more abundant (Proteo:Acido = 1.6). Proportionally less nitrate could be denitrified there (denitrification:DNRA = 1), possibly increasing its availability. Among 10 potential keystone species, microbes capable of DNRA were identified in the beech soil while instead denitrifiers dominated in the spruce soil. In spite of the former acid deposition impact, distinct microbial functional guilds developed under different vegetational dominance, resulting in different N immobilization potentials, possibly influencing the ecosystem's nitrogen retention ability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences in the composition of bacterial, fungal and archaeal communities between the beech (n = 16) and spruce (n = 16) soils. Only those phyla and classes with more than 1% of relative abundance are shown. Statistical significances are marked by asterisks as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Redundancy analyses (RDA) of prokaryotic community. RDA of relative OTU abundances of prokaryotic phyla in the beech (n = 16) and spruce (n = 16) soils. The relation of the environmental variables to the prokaryotic community composition is shown. Each point represents an individual soil sample used in the analysis. The direction and length of arrows show the correlational strength between the abundance of each prokaryotic phylum and environmental variable. RDA1 axis explained 43.0% and RDA2 explained 12.4% of variability in prokaryotic community composition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Conceptual scheme of main N cycle pathways in the spruce and beech soils. Nitrogen transformation processes are depicted with different colors. Pathways are based on functional assignment (RDP FunGene database, Table S2). Thickness of the arrows corresponds to absolute abundances of assigned bacterial functional guilds recalculated by qPCR.
Figure 4
Figure 4
OTU network analyses of the beech (a) and spruce (b) prokaryotic communities. Each OTU (node) is colored by the phylum it belongs to. Labels of nodes shows respective bacterial or archaeal classes. The size of node corresponds to the average abundance of each OTU. Green color of edges shows positive relationship (i.e. co-presence of OTUs) and red edge color shows negative relationship (i.e. mutual exclusion of OTUs).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clark CM, et al. Environmental and plant community determinants of species loss following nitrogen enrichment. Ecol Lett. 2007;10:596–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01053.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cleland EE, Harpole WS. Nitrogen enrichment and plant communities. Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology 2010. 2010;1195:46–61. - PubMed
    1. LeBauer DS, Treseder KK. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology. 2008;89:371–379. doi: 10.1890/06-2057.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kopacek J, et al. Nitrogen, organic carbon and sulphur cycling in terrestrial ecosystems: linking nitrogen saturation to carbon limitation of soil microbial processes. Biogeochemistry. 2013;115:33–51. doi: 10.1007/s10533-013-9892-7. - DOI
    1. Treseder KK. Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies. Ecology Letters. 2008;11:1111–1120. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01230.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources