Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;47(13):1724-1729.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3960-4. Epub 2017 Aug 29.

The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center

Affiliations

The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center

Bonmyong Lee et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The American College of Radiology (ACR) practice parameters for communication dictate that follow-up recommendations be suggested when appropriate. Radiologists assume that referring physicians read their reports and heed their advice. In reality, recommendations might not be carried out or even acknowledged.

Objective: We aimed to determine the proportion of imaging recommendations that are acknowledged and acted upon.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all consecutive radiology reports containing "recommend" in the impression at a single academic children's hospital over a 1-month period. We documented point of care (emergency department, inpatient, outpatient), study type, recommendation wording, and communication method (report only or direct verbal). We reviewed medical records to ascertain whether the recommendations were acknowledged or executed. We used chi-square tests to evaluate associations between variables. P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results: We reviewed 526 reports and excluded 73. We included the remaining 453 reports, from 370 unique patients (201 male, 169 female). Inpatients comprised most reports (n=223), followed by emergency department (ED) patients (n=118) and outpatients (n=112). Among these reports, 69% (n=313) of recommendations were executed. Of the 140 recommendations not carried out, 14% were acknowledged in clinical notes. Compliance correlated with point of care (ED>inpatient>outpatient; P=0.001) but not with additional verbal communication (P=0.33), study type (radiograph vs. other; P=0.35) or type of follow-up recommendation (follow-up imaging vs. other; P=0.99).

Conclusion: Nearly one-third of radiology report follow-up recommendations are not executed. Recommendations are most commonly neglected for outpatient imaging reports. The radiology community should take steps to improve recommendation adherence.

Keywords: Children; Follow-up; Radiology; Recommendations; Reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 Dec;1(4):253-261 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):544-9 - PubMed
    1. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013 Feb;57(1):1-7 - PubMed
    1. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 Dec;1(4):263-268 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Dec;205(6):1281-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources