A 12-Month Review of Revisional Single Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Complicated Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding for Body Mass Index over 35
- PMID: 28852957
- DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2887-z
A 12-Month Review of Revisional Single Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Complicated Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding for Body Mass Index over 35
Abstract
Background: In many countries, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) was previously the most commonly performed bariatric procedure due to its operative safety and early efficacy. This procedure is now superseded because of doubtful long-term results and late complications. Many people eventually required revisional bariatric surgery such as conversion to single anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB). This study aims to assess the safety and durability of single-stage conversion from LAGB to SAGB in patients who are intolerant to LAGB and who also fail to lose weight, or re-gain weight.
Methods: Seventy-four patients with BMI > 35 kg m-2 were selected from a prospective bariatric database between July 2012 and December 2015 for revisional laparoscopic SAGB surgery and were followed up at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after their operation.
Results: The mean BMI at 6 weeks, then 3, 6 and 12 months were 41.6 ± 7.66, 38.8 ± 7.54, 35.4 ± 7.10 and 33.2 ± 7.34 kg m-2, respectively. The mean percentage EWL at 6 weeks then 3, 6 and 12 months were 21.0 ± 9.12, 37.8 ± 12.5, 55.1 ± 15.8 and 67.0 ± 19.6%, respectively. Postoperative follow-up at these times were 97, 85, 69 and 46%, respectively. Early (< 30 day) morbidity was 20.3% with major complications of CD grade 3a or more of 13.5%.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that single-stage revisional SAGB after a failed LAGB achieved good short-term weight loss and low 30-day morbidity.
Keywords: Failed gastric banding; Gastric bypass; Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB); Revisional bariatric surgery; Single anastomosis gastric bypass (SAGB); Weight loss 12 months.
Similar articles
-
Revisional Gastric Bypass for Failed Restrictive Procedures: Comparison of Single-Anastomosis (Mini-) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):970-975. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2991-0. Obes Surg. 2018. PMID: 29101719
-
Conversion of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding to Gastric Bypass: a Comparison to Primary Gastric Bypass.Obes Surg. 2018 Jun;28(6):1519-1525. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3047-1. Obes Surg. 2018. PMID: 29204778
-
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after successful weight loss with a laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: rationales and early outcomes in patients of body mass index<35 kg/m(2.).Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 21. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014. PMID: 24986461
-
Laparoscopic conversion of laparoscopic gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 70 patients.Obes Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec;14(10):1349-53. doi: 10.1381/0960892042584003. Obes Surg. 2004. PMID: 15603650 Review.
-
Short-Term Outcomes of Conversion of Failed Gastric Banding to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy or Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: a Meta-Analysis.Obes Surg. 2019 Feb;29(2):420-425. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3538-8. Obes Surg. 2019. PMID: 30293135
Cited by
-
Secondary Bariatric Procedures in a High-Volume Centre: Prevalence, Indications and Outcomes.Obes Surg. 2019 Jul;29(7):2255-2262. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03838-z. Obes Surg. 2019. PMID: 30895507
-
Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement.Obes Surg. 2018 May;28(5):1188-1206. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3182-3. Obes Surg. 2018. PMID: 29600339
-
IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB).Obes Surg. 2021 Jul;31(7):3251-3278. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05413-x. Epub 2021 May 3. Obes Surg. 2021. PMID: 33939059 Review.
-
Revisional One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Restrictive Index Surgery-a Metaanalysis and Comparison with Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.Obes Surg. 2021 Mar;31(3):949-964. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05094-y. Epub 2020 Nov 6. Obes Surg. 2021. PMID: 33159293
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical