Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 30;8(3):893-909.
doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-02-R-0023.

Enhancing Patient Safety Event Reporting. A Systematic Review of System Design Features

Yang Gong  1 , Hong Kang, Xinshuo Wu, Lei Hua
Affiliations

Enhancing Patient Safety Event Reporting. A Systematic Review of System Design Features

Yang Gong et al. Appl Clin Inform. .

Abstract

Objectives: Electronic patient safety event reporting (e-reporting) is an effective mechanism to learn from errors and enhance patient safety. Unfortunately, the value of e-reporting system (a software or web server based platform) in patient safety research is greatly overshadowed by low quality reporting. This paper aims at revealing the current status of system features, detecting potential gaps in system design, and accordingly proposing suggestions for future design and implementation of the system.

Methods: Three literature databases were searched for publications that contain informative descriptions of e-reporting systems. In addition, both online publicly accessible reporting forms and systems were investigated.

Results: 48 systems were identified and reviewed. 11 system design features and their frequencies of occurrence (Top 5: widgets (41), anonymity or confidentiality (29), hierarchy (20), validator (17), review notification (15)) were identified and summarized into a system hierarchical model.

Conclusions: The model indicated the current e-reporting systems are at an immature stage in their development, and discussed their future development direction toward efficient and effective systems to improve patient safety.

Keywords: Incident reporting; clinical information systems; medical informatics applications; patient safety; user-computer interface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the research.

Figures

None
A PRISMA flow diagram for the literature review process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS): World Health Organization. Available from:http://www.who.int/patientsafety/implementation/taxonomy/development_sit...
    1. Pronovost PJ, Morlock LL, Sexton JB, Miller MR, Holzmueller CG, Thompson DA, Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML.Improving the Value of Patient Safety Reporting SystemsIn:Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol 1: Assessment) Advances in Patient Safety.Rockville (MD)2008 - PubMed
    1. Barach P, Small SD.Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems BMJ 20003207237759–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahajan RP. Critical incident reporting and learning. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(01):69–75. - PubMed
    1. Shaw R, Drever F, Hughes H, Osborn S, Williams S. Adverse events and near miss reporting in the NHS. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(04):279–83. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types