Therapeutic time window for conivaptan treatment against stroke-evoked brain edema and blood-brain barrier disruption in mice
- PMID: 28854286
- PMCID: PMC5576654
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183985
Therapeutic time window for conivaptan treatment against stroke-evoked brain edema and blood-brain barrier disruption in mice
Abstract
Background: Ischemic stroke is often complicated by brain edema, disruption of blood-brain barrier (BBB), and uncontrolled release of arginine-vasopressin (AVP). Conivaptan, a V1a and V2 receptor antagonist, reduces brain edema and minimizes damage to the blood-brain barrier after stroke. Most stroke patients do not receive treatment immediately after the onset of brain ischemia. Delays in therapy initiation may worsen stroke outcomes. Therefore, we designed a translational study to explore the therapeutic time window for conivaptan administration.
Methods: Mice were treated with conivaptan beginning 3, 5, or 20 hours after 60-minute focal middle cerebral artery occlusion. Treatments were administered by continuous IV infusion for a total of 48 hours. Brain edema and blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption were evaluated at endpoint.
Results: Conivaptan therapy initiated at 3 hours following ischemia reduced edema in the ipsilateral hemisphere, which corresponded with improvements in neurological deficits. Stroke-triggered BBB disruption was also reduced in mice when conivaptan treatments were initiated at 3 hours of reperfusion. However, 5 and 20-hour delays of conivaptan administration failed to reduce edema or protect BBB.
Conclusion: Timing of conivaptan administration is important for successful reduction of brain edema and BBB disruption. Our experimental data open new possibilities to repurpose conivaptan, and make an important "bench-to-bedside translation" of the results into clinical practice.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



References
-
- Heiss WD. Malignant MCA Infarction: Pathophysiology and Imaging for Early Diagnosis and Management Decisions. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;41(1–2):1–7. doi: 10.1159/000441627 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Michinaga S, Koyama Y. Pathogenesis of brain edema and investigation into anti-edema drugs. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(5):9949–75. doi: 10.3390/ijms16059949 ; - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Figueroa SA, Zhao W, Aiyagari V. Emergency and critical care management of acute ischaemic stroke. CNS Drugs. 2015;29(1):17–28. doi: 10.1007/s40263-014-0210-2 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Vakili A, Kataoka H, Plesnila N. Role of arginine vasopressin V1 and V2 receptors for brain damage after transient focal cerebral ischemia. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism: official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2005;25(8):1012–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600097 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chelko SP, Schmiedt CW, Lewis TH, Lewis SJ, Robertson TP. Vasopressin-induced constriction of the isolated rat occipital artery is segment dependent. J Vasc Res. 2013;50(6):478–85. doi: 10.1159/000355265 ; - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous