Weight reduction intervention for obese infertile women prior to IVF: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 28854592
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex235
Weight reduction intervention for obese infertile women prior to IVF: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Study question: Does an intensive weight reduction programme prior to IVF increase live birth rates for infertile obese women?
Summary answer: An intensive weight reduction programme resulted in a large weight loss but did not substantially affect live birth rates in obese women scheduled for IVF.
What is already known: Among obese women, fertility and obstetric outcomes are influenced negatively with increased risk of miscarriage and a higher risk of maternal and neonatal complications. A recent large randomized controlled trial found no effect of lifestyle intervention on live birth in infertile obese women.
Study design, size, duration: A prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial was performed between 2010 and 2016 in the Nordic countries. In total, 962 women were assessed for eligibility and 317 women were randomized. Computerized randomization with concealed allocation was performed in the proportions 1:1 to one of two groups: weight reduction intervention followed by IVF-treatment or IVF-treatment only. One cycle per patient was included.
Participants/materials, setting, methods: Nine infertility clinics in Sweden, Denmark and Iceland participated. Women under 38 years of age planning IVF, and having a BMI ≥30 and <35 kg/m2 were randomized to two groups: an intervention group (160 patients) with weight reduction before IVF, starting with 12 weeks of a low calorie liquid formula diet (LCD) of 880 kcal/day and thereafter weight stabilization for 2-5 weeks, or a control group (157 patients) with IVF only.
Main results and role of chance: In the full analysis set (FAS), the live birth rate was 29.6% (45/152) in the weight reduction and IVF group and 27.5% (42/153) in the IVF only group. The difference was not statistically significant (difference 2.2%, 95% CI: 12.9 to -8.6, P = 0.77). The mean weight change was -9.44 (6.57) kg in the weight reduction and IVF group as compared to +1.19 (1.95) kg in the IVF only group, being highly significant (P < 0.0001). Significantly more live births were achieved through spontaneous pregnancies in the weight reduction and IVF group, 10.5% (16) as compared to the IVF only group 2.6% (4) (P = 0.009). Miscarriage rates and gonadotropin dose used for IVF stimulation did not differ between groups. Two subgroup analyses were performed. The first compared women with PCOS in the two randomized groups, and the second compared women in the weight reduction group reaching BMI ≤ 25 kg/m2 or reaching a weight loss of at least five BMI units to the IVF only group. No statistical differences in live birth rates between the groups in either subgroup analysis were found.
Limitations, reason for caution: The study was not powered to detect a small increase in live births due to weight reduction and was not blinded for the patients or physician. Further, the intervention group had a longer time to achieve a spontaneous pregnancy, but were therefore slightly older than the control group at IVF. The study only included women with a BMI lower than 35 kg/m2.
Wider implications of the findings: The study suggests that weight loss for obese women (BMI: 30-34.9 kg/m2) may not rectify the outcome in IVF cycles, although a significant higher number of spontaneous conceptions occurred in the weight loss group. Also, the study suggests that intensive weight reduction with LCD treatment does not negatively affects the results.
Study funding/competing interest(s): The study was funded by Sahlgrenska University Hospital (ALFGBG-70 940), Merck AB, Solna, Sweden (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Impolin AB, Hjalmar Svensson Foundation and Jane and Dan Olsson Foundation. Dr Thurin-Kjellberg reports grants from Merck, non-financial support from Impolin AB, during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from Merck outside the submitted work. Dr Friberg reports personal fees from Ferring, Merck, MSD, Finox and personal fees from Studentlitteratur, outside the submitted work. Dr Englund reports personal fees from Ferring, and non-financial support from Merck, outside the submitted work. Dr Bergh reports and has been reimbursed for: writing a newsletter twice a year (Ferring), lectures (Ferring, MSD, Merck), and Nordic working group meetings (Finox). Dr Karlström reports lectures (Ferring, Finox, Merck, MSD) and Nordic working group meetings (Ferring). Ms Kluge, Dr Einarsson, Dr Pinborg, Dr Klajnbard, Dr Stenlöf, Dr Larsson, Dr Loft and Dr Wistrand have nothing to disclose.
Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01566929.
Trial registration date: 23-03-2012.
Date of first patient's enrolment: 05-10-2010.
Keywords: IVF; infertility; low calorie diet; obesity; weight loss.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
Similar articles
-
Cumulative live birth rates after weight reduction in obese women scheduled for IVF: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.Hum Reprod Open. 2019 Dec 10;2019(4):hoz030. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz030. eCollection 2019. Hum Reprod Open. 2019. PMID: 31844684 Free PMC article.
-
Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.Hum Reprod. 2017 Nov 1;32(11):2225-2233. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex296. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 29040589 Clinical Trial.
-
The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF.Hum Reprod. 2023 May 2;38(5):927-937. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead038. Hum Reprod. 2023. PMID: 36864699 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study.Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 30. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 33272617
-
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: review and new classification criteria for reporting in clinical trials.Hum Reprod. 2016 Sep;31(9):1997-2004. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew149. Epub 2016 Jun 23. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 27343272 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of deep convolutional neural networks in classifying human embryo images based on their morphological quality.Heliyon. 2021 Feb 23;7(2):e06298. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06298. eCollection 2021 Feb. Heliyon. 2021. PMID: 33665450 Free PMC article.
-
Belgian Fertility Clinic Staff Value Healthy Lifestyle Promotion but Lack Access to a Structured Lifestyle Modification Programme: An Observational Study.Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023;88(5):278-285. doi: 10.1159/000531139. Epub 2023 Aug 8. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023. PMID: 37552964 Free PMC article.
-
Does body mass index impact assisted reproductive technology treatment outcomes in gestational carriers.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 May 2;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00602-2. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020. PMID: 32359356 Free PMC article.
-
A multidisciplinary approach to weight management and reproductive care: a retrospective cohort study on weight loss through personalized and patient-centered care.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Jun 10;23(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01415-x. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 40495238 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of bariatric surgery on periconception maternal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Update. 2021 Oct 18;27(6):1030-1055. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmab022. Hum Reprod Update. 2021. PMID: 34387675 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous