Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):270.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1448-8.

Factors influencing implementation of interventions to promote birth preparedness and complication readiness

Andrea Solnes Miltenburg  1 , Yadira Roggeveen  2 , Jos van Roosmalen  2 , Helen Smith  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Factors influencing implementation of interventions to promote birth preparedness and complication readiness

Andrea Solnes Miltenburg et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: The recent WHO report on health promotion interventions for maternal and newborn health recommends birth preparedness and complications readiness interventions to increase the use of skilled care at birth and to increase timely use of facility care for obstetric and newborn complications. However, these interventions are complex and relate strongly to the context in which they are implemented. In this article we explore factors to consider when implementing these interventions.

Methods: This paper reports a secondary analysis of 64 studies on birth preparedness and complication readiness interventions identified through a systematic review and updated searches. Analysis was performed using the Supporting the Use of Research Evidence (SURE) framework to guide thematic analysis of barriers and facilitators for implementation.

Results: Differences in definitions, indicators and evaluation strategies of birth preparedness and complication readiness interventions complicate the analysis. Although most studies focus on women as the main target group, multi-stakeholder participation with interventions occurring simultaneously at both community and facility level facilitated the impact on seeking skilled care at birth. Increase in formal education for women most likely contributed positively to results. Women and their families adhering to traditional beliefs, (human) resource scarcities, financial constraints of women and families and mismatches between offered and desired maternity care services were identified as key barriers for implementation.

Conclusions: Implementation of birth preparedness and complication readiness to improve the use of skilled care at birth can be facilitated by contextualizing interventions through multi-stakeholder involvement, targeting interventions at multiple levels of the health system and ensuring interventions and program messages are consistent with local knowledge and practices and the capabilities of the health system.

Keywords: Birth preparedness and complication readiness; Maternal health; Skilled birth attendant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors have competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Solnes Miltenburg A, Roggeveen Y, Shields L, van Elteren M, van Roosmalen J, Stekelenburg J, Portela A. Impact of birth preparedness and complication readiness interventions on birth with a skilled attendant: a systematic review. PlosOne. 2015;10(11):e0143382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143382. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. JHPIEGO/Maternal and Neonatal Health (MNH) Program. Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness: A Matrix of Shared Responsibility. Baltimore, MD; 2001.
    1. Carroli G, Villar J, Piaggio G, Khan-Neelofur D, Gülmezoglu M, Mugford M, et al. WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care. Lancet. 2001;357:1565–1570. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04723-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Di Mario S, Basevi V, Gori G, Spettoli D. What is the effectiveness of antenatal care? (supplement) WHO Regional Office for Europe Health Evidence Network: Copenhagen; 2005.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on health promotion interventions for maternal and newborn health 2015. 2015. - PubMed

MeSH terms