Women's Awareness of and Responses to Messages About Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment: Results From a 2016 National Survey
- PMID: 28857962
- PMCID: PMC5657609
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000798
Women's Awareness of and Responses to Messages About Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment: Results From a 2016 National Survey
Abstract
Background: Scientists, clinicians, and other experts aim to maximize the benefits of cancer screening while minimizing its harms. Chief among these harms are overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Although available data suggest that patient awareness of these harms is low, we know little about how patients respond to information about these phenomena.
Objectives: Using the case of breast cancer screening, this study assesses women's awareness of and reactions to statements about overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
Methods: We draw on data from a 2016 population-based survey of US women aged 35-55 years that oversampled women of lower socioeconomic position (those living at or below 100% of federal poverty level) (N=429).
Results: Results showed that women's awareness of overdiagnosis (16.5%) and overtreatment (18.0%) was low, and women under age 40 were least likely to have heard about overdiagnosis. Most women did not evaluate statements about these harms positively: <1 in 4 agreed with and found statements about overdiagnosis and overtreatment to be believable, and even fewer evaluated them as strong arguments to consider in their own mammography decision making. Women with a recent mammogram history were particularly unconvinced by overdiagnosis and overtreatment arguments.
Conclusions: A majority of women were unaware of 2 important harms of breast cancer screening: overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Most did not find statements about these harms to be believable and persuasive. Communication interventions, supported by evidence from health communication research, are necessary to improve patient understanding of screening's harms, promote informed decision making, and, in turn, ensure high-value care.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
-
- Harris RP, Wilt TJ, Qaseem A. A Value Framework for Cancer Screening: Advice for High-Value Care From the American College of PhysiciansA Value Framework for Cancer Screening. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(10):712–717. - PubMed
-
- Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(9):605–613. - PubMed
-
- Jørgensen K, Gøtzsche PC, Kalager M, et al. Breast cancer screening in Denmark: A cohort study of tumor size and overdiagnosis. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(5):313–323. - PubMed
-
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
