Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 31;8(8):e115.
doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.42.

Endoscopic Drainage of >50% of Liver in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction Using Metallic or Fenestrated Plastic Stents

Affiliations

Endoscopic Drainage of >50% of Liver in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction Using Metallic or Fenestrated Plastic Stents

Tossapol Kerdsirichairat et al. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Endoscopic drainage of complex hilar tumors has generally resulted in poor outcomes. Drainage of >50% of liver volume has been proposed as optimal, but not evaluated using long multifenestrated plastic stents (MFPS) or self-expanding metal stents (SEMS). We evaluated outcomes of endoscopic drainage of malignant hilar strictures using optimal strategy and stents, and determined factors associated with stent patency, survival, and complications.

Methods: Cross-sectional study was conducted at an academic center over 5 years. MFPS (10 French or 8.5 French) or open-cell SEMS were used for palliation of unresectable malignant hilar strictures, with imaging-targeted drainage of as many sectors as needed to drain >50% of viable liver volume. Risk factors were evaluated using regression analysis. The cumulative risk was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: 77 patients with malignant hilar biliary strictures (median Bismuth IV) underwent targeted stenting (41 MFPS and 36 SEMS). Comparing MFPS vs. SEMS, technical success (95.1 vs. 97.2%, P=0.64), clinical success (75.6 vs. 83.3%, P=0.40), frequency of multiple stents (23/41 vs. 25/36, P=0.19), survival and adverse events were similar, but stent patency was significantly shorter (P<0.0001). Factors associated with survival were Karnofsky score and serum bilirubin level at presentation. Outcomes were independent of Bismuth class with acceptable results in Bismuth III and IV.

Conclusions: Endoscopic biliary drainage with MFPS or open-cell SEMS targeting >50% of viable liver resulted in effective palliation in patients with complex malignant hilar biliary strictures. Patency was shorter in the MFPS group, but similar survival and complications were found when comparing MFPS and SEMS group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Guarantor of article: Martin L. Freeman, MD, FASGE.

Specific author contributions: Conception and design: Tossapol Kerdsirichairat, Martin L. Freeman. Acquisition of data: Tossapol Kerdsirichairat, Mustafa A. Arain, Rajeev Attam, Brooke Glessing, Yan Bakman. Data analysis: Tossapol Kerdsirichairat, Rajeev Attam, Brooke Glessing, Stuart K. Amateau, Martin L. Freeman. Drafting the article: Tossapol Kerdsirichairat, Martin L. Freeman. Critical revision: Tossapol Kerdsirichairat, Mustafa A. Arain, Rajeev Attam, Brooke Glessing, Yan Bakman, Stuart A. Amateau, Martin L. Freeman. Final approval of the revision: Martin L. Freeman. All authors approved the final version of the article, including the authorship list.

Financial support: None.

Potential competing interests: Martin Freeman: Consultants for Boston Scientific, Xlumena, and Cook Endoscopy. Mustafa Arain: Consultant for Boston Scientific. Tossapol Kerdsirichairat: An associate editor of the ACG Case Reports journal and receives a grant for ACG annual meeting. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(ad) MFPS 10 French 20 cm (upper, a), MFPS 8.5 French 20 cm (middle, b). MFPS is pliable (lower, left, and right, c, d) and is suitable for stenting of sectoral biliary ducts. (e, f) A tight hilar stenosis and severe upstream dilatation from metastatic rectal carcinoma to the hepatic hilum (e). This was treated with three 8.5 French 16 cm MFPS to all sectoral ducts (left, right anterior and right posterior) (f).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Open-cell laser cut metallic stents used for hilar tumor drainage showing large interstices allowing Y stent placement. (b) Y configuration of standard open-cell laser cut metallic stent. (c, d) Complex Bismuth IV tumor (c) treated with three 10 mm laser cut stents in “Y” configuration to drain all three sectoral (left, right anterior, and right posterior) ducts (d).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Survival of patients with malignant hilar obstruction treated with multifenestrated plastic stents (MFPS) (n=41) and self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) (n=36), P=0.88 by Kaplan–Meier analysis. (b, c) Survival of patients with malignant hilar obstruction treated with MFPS (n=41) and SEMS (n=36), stratified by nature of malignant hilar obstruction (P=0.95 for cholangiocarcinoma subgroup, and P=0.26 for distant metastasis subgroup). (d) Stent patency in patients with malignant hilar obstruction treated with MFPS (n=41) and SEMS (n=36), P<0.0001 by Kaplan–Meier analysis.

References

    1. Larghi A, Tringali A, Lecca PG et al. Management of hilar biliary strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 458–473. - PubMed
    1. Wagner HJ, Knyrim K, Vakil N et al. Plastic endoprostheses versus metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction. A prospective and randomized trial. Endoscopy 1993; 25: 213–218. - PubMed
    1. Perdue DG, Freeman ML, DiSario JA et al. Plastic versus self-expanding metallic stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 1040–1046. - PubMed
    1. Webb K, Saunders M. Endoscopic management of malignant bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 2013; 23: 313–331. - PubMed
    1. Sangchan A, Kongkasame W, Pugkhem A et al. Efficacy of metal and plastic stents in unresectable complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 93–99. - PubMed