Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 Feb;286(2):581-589.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170285. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

Evaluation of Kidney Stones with Reduced-Radiation Dose CT: Progress from 2011-2012 to 2015-2016-Not There Yet

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Evaluation of Kidney Stones with Reduced-Radiation Dose CT: Progress from 2011-2012 to 2015-2016-Not There Yet

Karrin Weisenthal et al. Radiology. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose To determine if the use of reduced-dose computed tomography (CT) for evaluation of kidney stones increased in 2015-2016 compared with that in 2011-2012, to determine variability in radiation exposure according to facility for this indication, and to establish a current average radiation dose for CT evaluation for kidney stones by querying a national dose registry. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study was exempt from institutional review board approval. Data were obtained from the American College of Radiology dose registry for CT examinations submitted from July 2015 to June 2016. Study descriptors consistent with single-phase unenhanced CT for evaluation of kidney stones and associated RadLex® Playbook identifiers (RPIDs) were retrospectively identified. Facilities actively submitting data on kidney stone-specific CT examinations were included. Dose metrics including volumetric CT dose index, dose-length product, and size-specific dose estimate, when available, were reported, and a random effects model was run to account for clustering of CT examinations at facilities. A z-ratio was calculated to test for a significant difference between the proportion of reduced-radiation dose CT examinations (defined as those with a dose-length product of 200 mGy · cm or less) performed in 2015-2016 and the proportion performed in 2011-2012. Results Three hundred four study descriptors for kidney stone CT corresponding to data from 328 facilities that submitted 105 334 kidney stone CT examinations were identified. Reduced-dose CT examinations accounted for 8040 of 105 334 (7.6%) CT examinations, a 5.6% increase from the 1010 of 49 903 (2%) examinations in 2011-2012 (P < .001). Mean overall dose-length product was 689 mGy · cm (95% confidence interval: 667, 712), decreased from the mean of 746 mGy · cm observed in 2011-2012. Median facility dose-length product varied up to sevenfold, from less than 200 mGy · cm to greater than 1600 mGy · cm. Conclusion Use of reduced-radiation dose CT for evaluation of kidney stones has increased since 2011-2012, but remains low; variability of radiation dose according to facility continues to be wide. National mean CT radiation exposure for evaluation of renal colic during 2015-2016 decreased relative to 2011-2012 values, but remained well above what is reasonably achievable. © RSNA, 2017.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flowchart shows exclusion criteria for dataset query. RadLex® Playbook identifier (RPID), the internal categorization system of the DIR. RPID-unwanted indicates scan originally performed at outside facility. Study descriptors (SD) are termed unmapped if the facility had not completed its DIR set up and had not mapped the given study descriptor to an RPID.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Scatterplot shows data from all facilities. X-axis represents number of kidney stone CT examinations submitted to the DIR during study period. Y-axis represents median DLP of examinations submitted by facility.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Histogram shows DLP for all kidney stone CT examinations in dataset grouped in 100-mGy · cm increments. Number on top of bars indicates total percentage of CT examinations in that DLP range. DLPs less than 200 mGy · cm = reduced-dose CT and correspond to effective dose of 3 mSv.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
A, Histogram shows facility median DLPs grouped in 100-mGy · cm increments. Forty six of 328 (14%) facilities achieved median DLPs of less than 400 mGy · cm. B, Histogram shows facility median SSDEs grouped by 1-mGy increments for 151 facilities that submitted data on SSDEs for at least 50% of kidney stone CT examinations submitted to DIR.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Scatterplot shows facility median DLPs and SSDEs for facilities that contributed greater than 50% of examinations with data necessary to calculate SSDE with best fit line.

Comment in

References

    1. Scales CD, Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS; Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 2012;62(1):160–165. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hyams ES, Korley FK, Pham JC, Matlaga BR. Trends in imaging use during the emergency department evaluation of flank pain. J Urol 2011;186(6):2270–2274. - PubMed
    1. Mandeville JA, Gnessin E, Lingeman JE. Imaging evaluation in the patient with renal stone disease. Semin Nephrol 2011;31(3):254–258. - PubMed
    1. Fwu C-W, Eggers PW, Kimmel PL, Kusek JW, Kirkali Z. Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States. Kidney Int 2013;83(3):479–486. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson CM, Wilson DM, O’Fallon WM, Malek RS, Kurland LT. Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota. Kidney Int 1979;16(5):624–631. - PubMed

Publication types