Project Stronger Together: Protocol to Test a Dyadic Intervention to Improve Engagement in HIV Care Among Sero-Discordant Male Couples in Three US Cities
- PMID: 28860107
- PMCID: PMC5599729
- DOI: 10.2196/resprot.7884
Project Stronger Together: Protocol to Test a Dyadic Intervention to Improve Engagement in HIV Care Among Sero-Discordant Male Couples in Three US Cities
Abstract
Background: An estimated one- to-two-thirds of new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections among US men who have sex with men (MSM) occur within the context of primary partnerships. Despite this fact, there remains a lack of prevention interventions that focus on male sero-discordant dyads. Interventions that provide male couples with skills to manage HIV risk, and to support each other towards active engagement in HIV prevention and care, are urgently needed.
Objective: The objective of this paper is to describe the protocol for an innovative dyadic intervention (Stronger Together) that combines couples' HIV testing and dyadic adherence counseling to improve treatment adherence and engagement in care among HIV sero-discordant male couples in the United States.
Methods: The research activities involve a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) of approximately 165 venue- and clinic-recruited sero-discordant male couples (330 individuals: 165 HIV sero-negative and 165 HIV sero-positive). Couples randomized into the intervention arm receive couples' HIV counseling and testing plus dyadic adherence counseling, while those randomized to the control arm receive individual HIV counseling and testing. The study takes place in three cities: Atlanta, GA (study site Emory University); Boston, MA (study site The Fenway Institute); and Chicago, IL (study site Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago). Cohort recruitment began in 2015. Couples are followed prospectively for 24 months, with study assessments at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
Results: Stronger Together was launched in August 2014. To date, 160 couples (97% of the target enrollment) have been enrolled and randomized. The average retention rate across the three sites is 95%. Relationship dissolution has been relatively low, with only 13 couples breaking up during the RCT. Of the 13 couples who have broken up, 10 of the 13 HIV-positive partners have been retained in the cohort; none of these HIV-positive partners have enrolled new partners into the RCT.
Conclusions: The intervention offers a unique opportunity for sero-discordant couples to support each other towards common HIV management goals by facilitating their development of tailored prevention plans via couples-based HIV testing and counseling, as well as problem-solving skills in Partner Strategies to Enhance Problem-solving Skills (STEPS).
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01772992; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01772992 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6szFBVk1R).
©Rob Stephenson, Nicolas A Suarez, Robert Garofalo, Marco A Hidalgo, Samuel Hoehnle, Jennie Thai, Matthew J Mimiaga, Emily Brown, Anna Bratcher, Taylor Wimbly, Patrick Sullivan. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 31.08.2017.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Home-Based HIV Testing and Counseling for Male Couples (Project Nexus): A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 May 30;6(5):e101. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7341. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017. PMID: 28559225 Free PMC article.
-
Stronger Together: Results from a Randomized Controlled Efficacy Trial of a Dyadic Intervention to Improve Engagement in HIV Care Among Serodiscordant Male Couples in Three US Cities.AIDS Behav. 2021 Aug;25(8):2369-2381. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03199-8. Epub 2021 Feb 25. AIDS Behav. 2021. PMID: 33630199 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Dyadic Behavioral Intervention to Optimize Same Sex Male Couples' Engagement Across the HIV Care Continuum: Development of and Protocol for an Innovative Couples-based Approach (Partner Steps).JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Aug 25;5(3):e168. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6271. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016. PMID: 27562905 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship Education and HIV Prevention for Young Male Couples Administered Online via Videoconference: Protocol for a National Randomized Controlled Trial of 2GETHER.JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 27;9(1):e15883. doi: 10.2196/15883. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020. PMID: 32012111 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Tailored HIV Prevention Intervention for Single Young Men Who Have Sex With Men Who Meet Partners Online: Protocol for the myDEx Project.JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Jul 19;6(7):e141. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7965. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017. PMID: 28724513 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Romantic relationships and sexual minority health: A review and description of the Dyadic Health Model.Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Dec;82:101924. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101924. Epub 2020 Sep 23. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020. PMID: 33002795 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinically significant depressive symptoms among a diverse sample of same-sex male couples in Atlanta, Boston, and Chicago: An analysis of individual- and dyadic-level factors.J Gay Lesbian Ment Health. 2018;22(4):327-347. doi: 10.1080/19359705.2018.1476278. Epub 2018 Sep 20. J Gay Lesbian Ment Health. 2018. PMID: 35847160 Free PMC article.
-
Latent Profile Patterns of Network-Level Norms and Associations with Individual-Level Sexual Behaviors: The N2 Cohort Study in Chicago.Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Aug;52(6):2355-2372. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02555-0. Epub 2023 Mar 6. Arch Sex Behav. 2023. PMID: 36877319 Free PMC article.
-
Concordance in Reported Love, Trust, and Relationship Quality among Same-Sex Male Relationships.J Relatsh Res. 2018;9:e20. doi: 10.1017/jrr.2018.19. Epub 2019 Jan 15. J Relatsh Res. 2018. PMID: 31447951 Free PMC article.
-
A modeling framework to inform preexposure prophylaxis initiation and retention scale-up in the context of 'Getting to Zero' initiatives.AIDS. 2019 Oct 1;33(12):1911-1922. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002290. AIDS. 2019. PMID: 31490212 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Goodreau SM, Carnegie NB, Vittinghoff E, Lama JR, Sanchez J, Grinsztejn B, Koblin BA, Mayer KH, Buchbinder SP. What drives the US and Peruvian HIV epidemics in men who have sex with men (MSM)? PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050522. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050522 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gomez AM, Beougher SC, Chakravarty D, Neilands TB, Mandic CG, Darbes LA, Hoff CC. Relationship dynamics as predictors of broken agreements about outside sexual partners: implications for HIV prevention among gay couples. AIDS Behav. 2012 Aug;16(6):1584–8. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-0074-0. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hoff CC, Beougher SC, Chakravarty D, Darbes LA, Neilands TB. Relationship characteristics and motivations behind agreements among gay male couples: differences by agreement type and couple serostatus. AIDS Care. 2010 Jul;22(7):827–35. doi: 10.1080/09540120903443384. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/20635246 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Stephenson R, White D, Darbes L, Hoff C, Sullivan P. HIV testing behaviors and perceptions of risk of HIV infection among MSM with main partners. AIDS Behav. 2015 Mar;19(3):553–60. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0862-4. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25081599 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical