Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 31;7(1):10146.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09256-4.

Differences in characteristics of glucose intolerance between patients with NAFLD and chronic hepatitis C as determined by CGMS

Affiliations

Differences in characteristics of glucose intolerance between patients with NAFLD and chronic hepatitis C as determined by CGMS

Tsunehiro Ochi et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Glucose intolerance frequently develops in accordance with the progression of chronic liver disease. However, differences in the characteristics of glucose intolerance between patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and those with chronic hepatitis C (C-CH) remain incompletely understood. To clarify these differences, patients with NAFLD (n = 37) and C-CH (n = 40) were evaluated with a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). In the patients with NAFLD, Maximum blood glucose concentration and blood glucose swings were significantly correlated with hepatic fibrosis markers. In the patients with C-CH, however, those two CGMS parameters were negatively correlated with the serum albumin (ALB) concentration. Furthermore, in the patients with C-CH with an ALB concentration of ≤4.0 g/dl, those two CGMS parameters were negatively correlated with the ALB concentration with greater statistical significance. In conclusion, obvious differences in the characteristics of glucose intolerance between patients with NAFLD and those with C-CH were clarified. In patients with NAFLD, glucose intolerance gradually progressed in accordance with the progression of hepatic fibrosis. In those with C-CH, glucose intolerance suddenly developed upon the appearance of hypoalbuminaemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between maximum blood glucose and various parameters in patients with NAFLD or C-CH. The maximum blood glucose was correlated with the fibrosis markers PLT count (r = −0.3388, P < 0.05), P-3-P (r = 0.4051, P < 0.05) and FIB-4 index (r = 0.3253, P < 0.05) in patients with NAFLD (n = 37) and with TP (r = −0.4749, P < 0.005), ALB (r = −0.5147, P < 0.001), HbA1c (r = 0.6027, P < 0.001), and 1,5-AG (r = −0.7020, P < 0.005) but not with fibrosis markers in patients with C-CH (n = 40).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between minimum blood glucose and various parameters in patients with NAFLD or C-CH. The minimum blood glucose was correlated with the PLT count (r = −0.3209, P < 0.05) and HbA1c (r = −0.5739, P < 0.001) in patients with C-CH (n = 40), but was not correlated with any parameters of liver function tests in patients with NAFLD (n = 37).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between BGS and various parameters in patients with NAFLD and C-CH. BGS were correlated with ALB (r = −0.3709, P < 0.05) and fibrosis markers such as the PLT count (r = −0.4114, P < 0.05), type IV collagen 7S (r = 0.3556, P < 0.05), P-3-P (r = 0.4796, P < 0.05), and the FIB-4 index (r = 0.3510, P < 0.05) in patients with NAFLD (n = 37) and with TP (r = −0.4574, P < 0.005), ALB (r = −0.4341, P < 0.01), HbA1c (r = 0.3963, P < 0.05), and 1,5-AG (r = −0.6193, P < 0.01) but not fibrosis markers in patients with C-CH (n = 40).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship between blood glucose and ALB in patients with C-CH with ALB of ≤4.0 or >4.0 g/dl. In patients with C-CH with ALB of ≤4.0 g/dl (n = 31), the maximum blood glucose (r = −0.5722, P < 0.001) and BGS (r = −0.5006, P < 0.005) were correlated with the ALB concentration, but these correlations were not found in patients with ALB of >4.0 g/dl (n = 9).

References

    1. Matteoni CA, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:1413–1419. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70506-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ono M, Saibara T. Clinical features of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in Japan: evidence from literature. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:725–732. doi: 10.1007/s00535-006-1876-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reddy SK, et al. Outcomes of curative treatment for hepatocellular cancer in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis versus hepatitis C and alcoholic liver disease. HEPATOLOGY. 2012;55:1809–1819. doi: 10.1002/hep.25536. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chitturi S, et al. NASH and insulin resistance: Insulin hypersecretion and specific association with the insulin resistance syndrome. HEPATOLOGY. 2002;35:373–379. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.30692. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marchesini G, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. HEPATOLOGY. 2003;37:917–923. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50161. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types