Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul 21:9:513-519.
doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S99700. eCollection 2017.

Vaginal rejuvenation: current perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Vaginal rejuvenation: current perspectives

Giussy Barbara et al. Int J Womens Health. .

Abstract

Female genital cosmetic surgery includes several procedures aimed at reaching better female genital appearance and/or improved sexual functioning. Among these procedures, vaginal rejuvenation is considered as one of the most controversial genital cosmetic surgical interventions and involves a range of surgical procedures performed by gynecologists or plastic surgeons to decrease the average diameter of the vagina, mainly for sexual reasons. In this narrative review, vaginal rejuvenation outcomes are examined in order to clarify the current scenario of the different vaginal rejuvenation techniques, as well as their effectiveness and associated complications. Psychological and ethical issues linked to these procedures are also addressed.

Keywords: female genital cosmetic surgery; vaginal rejuvenation; vaginoplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Iglesia CB. Cosmetic gynecology and the elusive quest for the “perfect vagina”. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(6):1083–1084. - PubMed
    1. Lowenstein L, Salonia A, Shechter A, Porst H, Burri A, Reisman Y. Physicians’ attitude toward female genital plastic surgery: a multinational survey. J Sex Med. 2014;11(1):33–39. - PubMed
    1. Committee on Gynecologic Practice. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Committee Opinion No 378: vaginal “rejuvenation” and cosmetic vaginal procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(3):737–738. - PubMed
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist . Ethical considerations in relation to female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS) RCOG Ethics Committee; 2013. [Accessed June 26, 2017]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/ethics-issues-....
    1. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists RANZCOG College Statement: C-Gyn 24. Vaginal “Rejuvenation” and Cosmetic Vaginal Procedures. 2008. [Accessed June 26, 2017]. Available from: https://www.ranzcog.edu.au/RANZCOG_SITE/media/DOCMAN-ARCHIVE/Vaginal%20r....